Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 040115
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2015
>
OCPB agenda 040115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 3:56:44 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 3:53:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/1/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 040115
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Conduct the Public Hearing and accept public, BOCC, and Planning Board comment on <br />the proposed amendment. <br />Refer the matter to the Planning Board with a requestthat a recommendation be <br />returned to the Board of County Commissioners in time for the September 4, 2014 <br />BOCC regular meeting. <br />Adjourn the public hearing until September 4, 2014 in order to receive and accept the <br />Planning Board's recommendation and any submittedwritten comments. <br />Commissioner Gordonreferred tothe use specific standardschart and askedwhy this is <br />not included in the rural buffer section. <br />Perdita Holtzsaid the standards are the same in the rural buffer as they are in the <br />agricultural residential. She referred to the amendment package, in article 5 andsaid any <br />amendments in red are just adding RB to a few sections. She said the standards are thesame, <br />and there has been no re-write of standards to make it pertain to the rural buffer. <br />Commissioner Gordonasked how the Planning Board consideration interfaceswith the <br />joint planning consideration. <br />Perdita Holtz said, within the rural buffer, the planning board will make a <br />recommendation on theJPA amendments as well. She said the planning board will be briefed <br />on this in April, and information will be shared from thepublic hearing, planned for March 27tH <br />She said the UDO revisions being considered tonight will beon the April planning board agenda <br />for them to make a recommendation as well. <br />Commissioner Gordon said the recommendation will be made with just thehearing <br />comments, but not with the comments from the jurisdictions. <br />Perdita Holtzsaid the UDO amendments are not what arebeingheard atthe March 27th <br />joint public hearing; this is to hear amendments to the joint planning land use planand <br />agreement, and there are very few amendments that need to occur. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked for a memo listing those amendments. <br />Perdita Holtz said this can be done. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked when the input on the UDO fromtheChapel Hill and <br />Carrboro publicofficials will come. <br />Perdita Holtz said public officials don't comment on UDO amendments unless staff <br />wants to bring something to theirattention. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked when these comments are due. <br />Perdita Holtz said these were due by tonight, but these will still be accepted while the <br />public hearing process is going on. She said written comments can be submitted as part of the <br />JPAprocess. <br />Chair Jacobs asked if there are any items in this proposal that have thesame issues that <br />the attorney and staff had in the previous proposal. <br />Perdita Holtz said this is not dueto comeback until September, so this is not an issue. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Price, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to: <br />1. Refer the matter to the Planning Board with a requestthat a recommendation be returned to <br />the Board of County Commissioners in time for the September 4, 2014 BOCC regular <br />meeting. <br />2. Adjourn the public hearing until September 4, 2014 in order to receive and accept the <br />Planning Board's recommendation and any submitted written comments. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />57
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.