Orange County NC Website
D R A F T <br />4 <br />Lisa Stuckey: Yeah, but maybe they don’t want to pay the taxes. If bringing the services in means higher taxes, I’m <br />not sure that’s what they would want. <br /> <br />Tony Blake: For example in the Mount Carmel area, would the town extend the water and sewer if they didn’t plan to <br />annex it and people who bought there must have known this, that annexation intent, and that’s where it’s gotten <br />fuzzy. <br /> <br />Craig Benedict: I think it leaves some problems for later, the whole fire district tax and who is going to service. It <br />does leave some lingering problems. <br /> <br />Paul Guthrie: As a resident in that neighborhood, I can tell you that’s a much more complicated topic. There were <br />false cost figures and the town manager of Chapel Hill’s estimated cost to the town for annexing the area, was way <br />below what the tax rate was supposed to be and the insurance companies had failed to recognize the fact there were <br />fire plugs in the neighborhood and took almost half the tax so there were a lot of other issues going on. <br /> <br />Tony Blake: All I’m saying is that without a timeline, some sort of use it or lose it piece, it leaves that sort of question <br />festering and you end up with this sort of situation. <br /> <br />Lisa Stuckey: On page 19, under Planning Board review, number 2, it says there will be a notification in a <br />newspaper. I worry a little that people might not see a notice in the paper. Most of the time I think the County <br />advertises in the News of Orange which no one in Chapel Hill ever reads, I mean no one, and the other one is the <br />Durham Herald which almost no one reads as well. I guess my other question is do people pay attention to the those <br />sufficiently. To have it really be effective notice. <br /> <br />Craig Benedict: I guess acknowledging that there might be a more elaborate way, besides the newspapers, the <br />Commissioners might say to mail it. I’ve noted it and I’ll let the Commissioners know that if they want this stuff to be <br />vetted at this level that a mail notice is probably more thorough. There’s later public hearings too. <br /> <br />Maxecine Mitchell: If you put signs up that’s better than the newspaper. <br /> <br />Pete Hallenbeck: The County needs to explore new ways to get the word out to everybody realizing how people get <br />their information today. <br /> <br />Lydia Wegman: Craig the point is to raise the issue. What level of involvement they want the Planning Board to <br />have. <br /> <br />Michael Harvey: One thing to remember, this is just a process to get to the state-required process, this is sort of an <br />initial scoping session. You can start the formal process to extend the ETJ and it still may be denied regardless of <br />what happens in this process. You are going to have multiple points of notification that has to occur. <br /> <br /> <br />AGENDA ITEM 9 UPDATE ON PROPOSED EFLAND ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICTS: To receive an update on the <br />proposed Efland zoning overlay districts (heard at the February 24, 2014 quarterly public <br />hearing). This item will likely be on the March 4th Planning Board agenda for a <br />recommendation to the BOCC. Presenter: Perdita Holts, Special Projects Coordinator <br /> <br />Perdita Holtz updated the Planning Board on the progress of the Efland zoning overlay district and the meeting held. <br />Lydia Wegman: These suggestions of the residents, are these changes that you are going to make in what you bring <br />to us next month? <br /> <br />Perdita Holtz: Yes, staff doesn’t have concerns. <br /> <br />8