Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 030415
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2015
>
OCPB agenda 030415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 3:52:52 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 3:49:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/4/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 030415
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Price saidshe voted against it last time, and her comments are thesame. <br />She questioned whether the public received notice of themeeting last year when thiswas on <br />the agenda. <br />Perdita Holtzsaid the notice went out for the November2012 quarterly public hearing, <br />and the noticecontained an update on the information meeting held in November, which was <br />attended by only ten residents. <br />Commissioner Price said she would still like to see more discussion withthe community. <br />Commissioner Pelissier said this reflects the comments of the small area plan. She said <br />that was a big picture, and this is only a smallsection of the Efland area plan. She is fine with <br />having communitymeetings. She said it is important to continue this to avoid waitinganother <br />year. She said things get more difficult the longer this goes on. She suggested continuing the <br />public hearingwith a set date. <br />Perdita Holtz suggested this be continued to the May Quarterly Public Hearing. She <br />said a public hearingout in the community has never been done before, and it would require a <br />quorumof both the Board and the planning board. She said a public meeting can be held with <br />staff in attendance. <br />Commissioner Pelissier said she wasnot trying to imply having a public hearing in the <br />community, as this will not allow for question and answers with staff, which is what the <br />community wants. She saidthis is called a public information session. <br />Ben Lloydsaid people really want a public information session. <br />Chair Jacobs noted, in fairness to staff, that meetingswere held at theEfland Ruritan <br />and there were repeated attempts to recruit people from Efland. He said therewere people <br />fromEfland who served diligently. He said this was the Efland Mebane small area plan. He <br />said the conversation included plans to get Mebaneinvolved to insure that it would not annex <br />into Efland. He said if this is not a concernnow, it is because Mebane has agreed not to do <br />this. He said there were signs up, and thereweremeetings attheEfland Community Center, <br />the Efland Ruritan Club and Efland Cheeks Elementary school. He feels it is a good idea for the <br />community to meet with staff to ask questions about this, andthenthis can come back to the <br />Board. He said there have been no attempts to excludeanyone. <br />An unidentified resident asked when the meeting was held at the Ruritan Club. He <br />asked if the details presented tonight werediscussed at that meeting four years ago. <br />Perdita Holtz said thedetails were discussed at the open house community meeting held <br />in November of 2012from 4 - 6 pm at the Efland CommunityCenter, and 10 peoplecame. <br />Greg Andrews said if this wasturned down last time, he would like to see what changes <br />have beenmade since then. <br />Chair Jacobs said staff does that in the documents, and this is included. <br />Greg Andrews said it seemsthat at leasttwo of theBoard membersrecognize that there <br />is not enough change to make a difference <br />A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Price to turn <br />thisproposal down and send it back to staffforfurther review and community input before <br />bringing it back. <br />Commissioner Gordon said this cannot be turneddown, as this is not voted on at this <br />meeting. She asked if Commissioner McKee would like to turn it back to the staff. <br />Commissioner McKee said it was turned back to staff a year ago. <br />Commissioner Rich said she is fine with the description of the sidewalksbecause of the <br />forward thinking that the sidewalk issue is not being dropped. She saidshe does not <br />understand why this wouldn't just continue to be a public hearing to get more information. <br />Commissioner Price said staff and the Commissioners would be able to have dialogue <br />withthe community. She said it would givemore time for community input. <br />Chair Jacobs said this may just be a difference of semantics. He said themotion is to <br />defer further Board of Commissioner consideration until staff meetswith the members of the <br />55
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.