Orange County NC Website
see the people who sat on this committee and made these recommendations. He referenced <br />the discussionaboutsidewalks and said he does notknow how safe walkways would beon <br />highway 70. He asked that this issue remain open. He saidthe Efland Ruritans would be <br />happy to hold this event in Efland. <br />Doug Efland said he owns property in the Efland village area. He said he has a lot of <br />questions, and he would like this to continue with some sort of public meeting in Efland. He said <br />there are a lot of things that are alarming or hard to understand in the proposed text. He <br />referenced shared right of ways and other parts of the text that he did not understand. He <br />referenced thesection on easement agreements between contiguous parcel owners and asked <br />what incentive it is for an adjacent property owner to enter an agreement with you if there are no <br />plans to develop their property. He said there are certainly questions. He questioned the <br />stipulations on connecting roadways to the east and west side of Mount Willing. He asked that <br />this discussion be continued. <br />Ben Lloyd said urban to him is Chapel Hill, Charlotte or New York City. He saidEfland is <br />a sleepy little community where most of the residents have been living there all of their lives. He <br />said this small area study has been going on for 20 years and notice of this public hearing was <br />given 15 days ago. He has taken a quick look at this plan, and it would take a lawyer to pick all <br />this stuff out. He said the people in the Efland community need to have the opportunity to have <br />some input into this plan. He asked for an openEfland community meeting, followed by a public <br />hearing for generalpublicinput. <br />He said he has a letter fromJoseph Forrest and he asked what to do with that. He read <br />theletter and asked it to be entered into therecord. <br />Bill Efland said he also agrees with having the hearing in Efland. He asked if the <br />residents are privy to having thenames of the people on the Mebane Efland small area plan <br />committee. He asked if therewereany Efland family members on that committee and he said <br />he feels that they should have been involved in this process. <br />Commissioner McKee said there were Efland folks on this committee. He said he would <br />share the list of names after the meeting. <br />Lindsey Efland said he has had40 years of Orange County government saving us from <br />ourselves. He said when all is said and done this languageaffects approximately ten parcelsof <br />land. He said there are only a few developable properties. He said it has also beennoted that <br />he community has not been part of the planning process of late. He said this is a significant <br />change for the future of the community and there is not any understandable language as it <br />relates to the re-development of buildings. He feels work needs to be done on this and local <br />input should be involved. He respectfully requests that the public hearing be continued while <br />planning staff works with land owners to help them, and the planning board, understand thefull <br />implications of what is going on. <br />Mike Efland questioned how many landowners ofinvolvedparcelswere on the <br />committee. He wants to knowwhose brainchild this is. <br />BrianEfland said there are a lot of Eflandsfrom Efland, and he is not awareof any who <br />were on the committee. He feels that stake holders should be involved in these decisions. He <br />noted the large number of community memberspresent, and he said no one who sees this likes <br />it. He would like to see continued discussion in the community. <br />Commissioner McKee said thiscamebefore the Board a year ago, and hestill does not <br />like it. He feels this should be sent back to staff with instructions to work withthe affected <br />community to address their concerns. He said this is not a countywidezoning overlay; it affects <br />a very small number of people in a very big way, and these people needto be involved upfront. <br />He understands therewas a public meeting two years ago, butthere have been changes made. <br />He does not think the public hearingneeds to be held over, butthisshould be sent back to staff <br />instead. <br />54