Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Tony Blake said onemore point would be to find out if the adjacent owners have been <br />notified to find out if this is a problem for them. <br />Michael Harvey saidthe adjoining property owners were made aware of the text <br />amendment. He said no complaints have been received. <br />Judy Foster saidshe owns the property next door to the kennel, andshehas no <br />objection to the 25 foot setback. She said she would agree to this, and she is right next to their <br />parking lot. <br />Commissioner Gordon said she is not unsympathetic to this; she is just trying to find out <br />what the options are. She said the question is a generalquestion about universal standards <br />versus specific standards. She saidshe loves dogs, and this is a wonderful operation that has <br />notconformed with the regulations, so it is a difficult question. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Dorosin, seconded by Commissioner Pelissier to: <br />1. Accept the applicant's proposed amendments to the UDO as detailed in this abstract and <br />attachments. <br />2. Refer the matter to the Planning Board with a requestthat a recommendation be returned to <br />the BOCC in time for the April 15, 2014 BOCC regular meeting. <br />3. Adjourn the public hearing until April 15, 2014 in order to receive and accept the <br />Planning Board's recommendation and any submitted written comments. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />3. 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text <br />Amendments and Zoning Atlas Amendments - To review government-initiated <br />amendments to the text of the Comprehensive Planand UDO and to the Zoning Atlas <br />to establish two newzoning overlay districts in the Efland area. <br />Perdita Holtz reviewedthe following PowerPoint slides: <br />Comprehensive Plan Text, Unified Development Ordinance Text, and ZoningAtlas <br />Amendments for Two New Zoning Overlay Districts in the Efland Area <br />Quarterly Public Hearing <br />February 24, 2014 <br />Item CA <br />Background <br />Heard at November 2012 quarterly publichearing <br />Denied by BOCC in February2013 <br />1 yearwaiting period required for a newapplication in cases of denial <br />Thisproposal is the staff-recommended version considered on February 5, 2013 <br />Basic Charge <br />Implementrecommendations in the adopted Efland- Mebane Small Area Plan to <br />establishdesign and site planning standards for this area of the County served by public <br />or quasi-public) water and sewer systems. <br />49