Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 030415
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2015
>
OCPB agenda 030415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 3:52:52 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 3:49:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/4/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 030415
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 6: Development Standards <br /> Section 6.6: Additional Standards for Overlay Districts <br /> <br />front of lots if rear access is proposed and feasible. <br />(2) In order to manage access on public streets, a site shall should be permitted no <br />more than one entrance and exit point unless justified by site configuration, trip <br />generation, and traffic conditions, including the need for separate service and <br />visitor/employee vehicular access, and/or one-way traffic movement, or other <br />factors. <br />(a) This standard applies to new construction or redevelopment of a site that <br />increases the square footage of a building by more than 50% of the <br />existing square footage. <br />(3) Intra-site accessibility shall should be provided. Vehicles shall should not be <br />required to enter the public street in order to move from one area to another on <br />the same site. <br />(a) This standard applies to new construction or redevelopment of a site that <br />increases the square footage of a building by more than 50% of the <br />existing square footage. <br />(4) On all corner lots, no vehicular openings shall be located closer than 60 feet from <br />the point of intersection of the street right-of-way lines. <br />(5) Driveway Eentrances/exits shall not exceed 36 feet in width measured at the <br />property line; however, in instances where parking lots serve tractor/trailer traffic, <br />the driveway entrance/exit may be increased to 40 feet in width. <br />(6) Exits for parking facilities containing more than 36 parking spaces shall contain <br />holding lanes for left-turning and right-turning traffic unless the Planning Director <br />determines that due to the physical features of a site, holding lanes would be <br />unsafe and should not be required. <br />(7) All driveway entrances must have an approved NCDOT driveway permit and <br />must be paved to NCDOT standards from the edge of the existing roadway <br />pavement to the existing right-of-way limit on the interior of the property. <br />(8) Pedestrian Circulation 35 <br />(a) Unless deemed unnecessary by the Planning Director during site plan <br />review, large projects, defined in (b), shall may be required to provide an <br />internal pedestrian circulation system, owned and maintained by the <br />property owner. The system shall may be required to provide pedestrian <br />walkways to outparcels and also within any large parking areas. <br />(b) For the purposes of this subsection, a large project is defined as one <br />located on 2 or more acres or proposing more than 15,000 square feet of <br />building area. A large parking area is one containing parking for 50 or <br />more vehicles. <br />(B) Outside Storage of Materials Prohibited 36 <br />(1) All outside storage of materials on lots other than those used for single-family <br />detached residential purposes is prohibited. <br />(2) This prohibition includes the storage of goods or materials which are not an <br />integral part of the use of the property and which are not obviously for sale. <br />35 In October 2011, the issue of sidewalks was discussed at a BOCC work session and the decision was made that, <br />due to NC counties’ challenges in funding maintenance of public sidewalks, public sidewalks would not become a <br />requirement for development in Orange County at this time. However, walkability in large commercial projects is <br />generally desirable as is the ability of pedestrians to safely traverse large parking areas. Therefore, staff is <br />suggesting that some projects may be required to provide privately maintained walkways. 36 This is a restriction currently found in the ECOD and is suggested for the Efland Village overlay district as well. <br /> <br />Orange County, North Carolina – Unified Development Ordinance Page 6-35 <br /> <br /> <br />37
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.