Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 030415
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2015
>
OCPB agenda 030415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 3:52:52 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 3:49:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/4/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 030415
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Article 6: Development Standards <br /> Section 6.6: Additional Standards for Overlay Districts <br /> <br />(a) A possible re-alignment of Efland-Cedar Grove Road under the existing <br />railroad track to connect to Mount Willing Road, as described in the <br />adopted Efland-Mebane Small Area Plan.26 <br />(b) The need for a connecting roadway between Mount Willing Road and <br />Buckhorn Road, as depicted on the Efland-Buckhorn-Mebane Access <br />Management Plan, adopted November 11, 2011. <br />(3) In order to manage access on public streets, a site shall be permitted no more <br />than one entrance/exit point unless justified by site configuration, trip generation, <br />and traffic conditions, including the need for separate service and <br />visitor/employee vehicular access, and/or one-way traffic movement, or other <br />factors.27 <br />(4) Intra-site accessibility shall be provided. Vehicles shall not be required to enter <br />the public street in order to move from one area to another on the same site. <br />(5) On all corner lots, no vehicular openings shall be located closer than 60 feet from <br />the point of intersection of the street right-of-way lines.28 <br />(6) Driveway eEntrances/exits shall not exceed 36 feet in width measured at the <br />property line; however, in instances where parking lots serve tractor/trailer traffic, <br />the driveway entrance/exit may be increased to 40 feet in width. <br />(7) Exits for parking facilities containing more than 36 parking spaces shall contain <br />holding lanes for left-turning and right-turning traffic unless the Planning Director <br />determines that due to the physical features of a site, holding lanes would be <br />unsafe and should not be required. <br />(8) Shared Driveways/Access <br />(a) In order to manage access minimize the number of driveway curb cuts <br />on Mount Willing Road, thereby improving traffic flow and safety, <br />developments subject to this Section, fronting on Mount Willing Road, <br />and located contiguous to one another shall provide shared <br />driveways/access whenever feasible, as determined during site plan <br />review. <br />(i) Owners of contiguous parcels subject to this Section shall <br />execute reciprocal easement agreements between the separate <br />property owners and have the same recorded in the Office of the <br />Orange County Register of Deeds prior to the issuance of a <br />Zoning Compliance Permit. The easement agreement shall be <br />sufficient to allow for the development of a private service road <br />or driveway to channel access from Mount Willing Road to each <br />property. Figure 6.6.2.A.3 shows an example of the shared <br />access. Methods to achieve shared driveways/access may <br />include reciprocal easement agreements among property <br />owners, reservation of future access easements on property <br />being developed, or other methods determined during site plan <br />review. <br />(ii) Developments subject to this Section, fronting on Mount Willing <br />Road, and not contiguous to other similarly situated development <br />shall be required to designate stub outs to adjoining properties <br />on the site plan so that shared access can be developed if and <br />26 The Efland Area Resident Group also has suggested that this alignment be removed from the adopted Access <br />Management Plan. (This action is separate from the UDO amendment). 27 (3) and (4) are current requirements for properties in EDDs and is good practice for many types of projects. <br />However, it should be noted that NCDOT may not approve more than one entrance/exit point - see (9) 28 (5) through (9) are current requirements of ECOD and are suggested as good practices to be implemented in the <br />Efland Interstate overlay district as well. <br /> <br />Orange County, North Carolina – Unified Development Ordinance Page 6-32 <br /> <br /> <br />34
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.