OCPB agenda 020415 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Efland Area Resident Group Input/Suggestions for each Proposed Standard is in the Column on the Right Efland Interstate Overlay District Easy Ref. No. Section Number in UDO Revisions Proposed Standard Efland Area Resident Group Input/Suggestion 1. 4.5.3 (B)(1) The minimum side and rear setback shall be with width of the required buffer in 6.6.3(B) or the setback required in Article 3 or Section 6.2.8, whichever is less, except as provided in (a). OK as is 2. 4.5.3(B)(1)(a) (Referenced in standard above) For parcels subject to the setback and yard requirements in Section 4.7.4, the requirements of said Section shall apply. OK as is 3. 4.5.3(B)(2) Where applicable, the front yard setback shall be measured from any future right-of-way as designated on the Orange County Thoroughfare Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Delete this requirement. It can be added in the future if necessary if/when a Comprehensive Transportation Plan that includes future right-of-way designations is adopted. 4. 6.6.3(A)(1) (A) is “Circulation and Connectivity” All site planning for property east of Mount Willing Road shall take into account the need for a connecting roadway between Mount Willing Road and the Interstate 85/U.S. Highway 70 Connector. OK as is 5. 6.6.3 (A)(2) All site planning west of Mount Willing Road shall take into account: (a) A possible re-alignment of Efland-Cedar Grove Road under the existing railroad track to connect to Mount Willing Road, as described in the adopted Efland-Mebane Small Area Plan. (b) The need for a connecting roadway between Mount Willing Road and Buckhorn Road, as depicted on the Efland-Buckhorn- Mebane Access Management Plan, adopted November 11, 2011. The possible realignment of Efland-Cedar Grove Road under the existing railroad track should be removed from the adopted Access Management Plan and proposed standard (a) should be deleted from the proposed UDO amendment. 6. 6.6.3 (A)(3) In order to manage access on public streets, a site shall be permitted no more than one entrance/exit point unless justified by site configuration, trip generation, and traffic conditions, including the need for separate service and visitor/employee vehicular access, and/or one-way traffic movement. Rewrite as follows: In order to manage access on public streets, a site shall be permitted no more than one entrance/exit point unless justified by site configuration, trip generation, and traffic conditions, including the need for separate service and visitor/employee vehicular access, and/or one-way traffic movement, or other factors. Page 1 of 17 January 26, 2015 43