Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 020415
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2015
>
OCPB agenda 020415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 3:49:38 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 3:47:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/4/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 020415
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
This information was distributed at the April 7, 2014 Public Information Meeting and was the basis of discussions Orange County Planning staff <br />had with a group of residents from August 2014 – January 2015. <br />Efland Village Overlay District <br />Easy <br />Ref. <br />No. <br />Section Number <br />in UDO <br />Revisions <br />Proposed Standard Explanation / Rationale <br />26. 4.6.3(C)(1) No fences shall be permitted in the front yard of <br />lots, other than those used for single-family <br />detached residential purposes, unless a <br />demonstrated need can be shown. <br />This is an aesthetic design principle that would disallow fences <br />in the front yard of new development (except single-family <br />residential) unless an applicant can demonstrate that their <br />project needs a fence in the front yard. The idea behind the <br />design principle is that “wall-to-wall” front yard fences (e.g., if <br />many parcels on a street has one) tend to visually lead to the <br />feeling of walled-off compounds, which is generally not the <br />idea of a village-like atmosphere. <br />27. 4.6.3(C)(2) Chain link or similar fencing shall not be permitted <br />for uses other than single-family detached <br />residential. <br />The idea behind this proposed standard deals with the <br />aesthetics of chain link fencing, especially if it were to be used <br />by many parcels on a given street. The standard would apply <br />only to new development and single-family residential uses <br />(both new and existing) would be able to use chain link <br />fencing. <br />Page 11 of 20 <br /> <br />33
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.