Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 020415
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2015
>
OCPB agenda 020415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 3:49:38 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 3:47:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/4/2015
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 020415
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
This information was distributed at the April 7, 2014 Public Information Meeting and was the basis of discussions Orange County Planning staff <br />had with a group of residents from August 2014 – January 2015. <br />Efland Village Overlay District <br />Easy <br />Ref. <br />No. <br />Section Number <br />in UDO <br />Revisions <br />Proposed Standard Explanation / Rationale <br />20. 4.6.3 (B)(1) In lieu of the front setback required in Article 3, the <br />minimum front yard setback for properties fronting <br />on U.S. Highway 70 shall be 30-feet. <br />Because a variety of zoning districts could be applied along <br />Highway 70, and the various zoning districts have differing <br />front setback requirements, this standard will allow all parcels <br />along Highway 70 to adhere to the same setback (30-feet). A <br />standard such as this is considered to be a good design <br />principle so that the street frontage has a more cohesive look <br />and “feel.” Setbacks are one of the defining factors that affect <br />the appearance of an area and affect people’s perceptions of <br />how “relatable” an area is. <br />21. 4.6.3 (B)(2) In lieu of the front setback required in Article 3, the <br />front yard setback for parcels located in the overlay <br />district but not fronting on U.S. Highway 70 shall be <br />in keeping with the front setback provided by <br />adjacent uses. <br />Because a variety of zoning districts could be applied in the <br />village overlay district and the zoning districts have differing <br />front setback requirements, this standard would require that <br />new development adhere to the setbacks of adjacent existing <br />uses. A standard such as this is considered to be a good design <br />principle so that the street frontage has a more cohesive look <br />and “feel.” Setbacks are one of the defining factors that affect <br />the appearance of an area and affect people’s perceptions of <br />how “relatable” an area is. <br />22. 4.6.3 (B)(3) The minimum side and rear setback shall be the <br />width of the required Land Use Buffer (Section <br />6.8.6) or the setback required in Article 3, <br />whichever is less, but in no case shall be less than <br />10-feet. <br />This proposed standard allows the side and rear property line <br />setbacks to match the buffer required on a parcel, so long as a <br />10-foot minimum is maintained. This is a lessening from the <br />existing regulations that apply in this area. This standard will <br />make the smaller parcels found in the area more developable <br />and also will lead to a more village style of development than <br />is found in areas of the county that do not have water & sewer <br />services. <br />Page 9 of 20 <br /> <br />31
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.