OCPB agenda 020415 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

D R A F T 6 Paul Guthrie: It seems to me that if this process will work at all, this Board may have a bigger responsibility because we have one shot to raise the critical questions that need to be considered in the decisions and that doesn’t happen in the joint session now where we sit there and listen to something until 11 o’clock at night and then by the time it’s over we can’t even remember what the questions are that you really think need to be considered. I think we have an obligation if this becomes practice to think through how we communicate through staff to the Board of County Commissioners on issues that need to be dealt with by the Commissioners at the time of testimony. The Boards that I have seen operate in this County only occasionally rise to that level. The staff rises to it but I’m not sure the boards do and we need to think about that as a Board. Perdita Holtz: Probably what will happen is that the Planning Board minutes will become part of that public hearing packet. Craig Benedict: We would accent anything different that occurred in the application from the original material. We do accent any new information, any change in information that has occurred from the original application and evidentiary material that comes forward. Pete Hallenbeck: Ok, so the action for tonight is? Perdita Holtz: Is there consensus that this flowchart captured the quasi-judicial discussion. MOTION by Paul Guthrie that the flowchart captured the Planning Board discussion of the quasi-judicial process. Seconded by Buddy Hartley. VOTE: UNANIMOUS Lydia Wegman: Let me clarify. I am voting to say the flowchart captures what we’ve talked about, I am not saying I agree with it just to be clear. AGENDA ITEM 9: COMMITTEE/ADVISORY BOARD REPORTS: a. Board of Adjustment AGENDA ITEM 10: ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Bryant Warren to adjourn. Seconded by Tony Blake. VOTE: UNANIMOUS 14