Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 110514
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2014
>
OCPB agenda 110514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 3:33:30 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 3:31:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/5/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 110514
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Buddy Hartley: Things come up and when things come up, you contact staff and you let them know, I can’t make this 860 <br />meeting for whatever reason. Everyone won’t be able to always make meetings and if that happened with 3 or 4 861 <br />people for the same meeting, you might not have a quorum. 862 <br /> 863 <br />Lisa Stuckey: It’s not a regularly scheduled meeting for us, it’s an odd meeting and I think that’s part of the problem 864 <br />and it’s on a Monday instead of Wednesday when we normally meet. Honestly when you’re talking about going to 865 <br />more meeting I wonder how many Planning Board members can really go to those neighborhood meetings. 866 <br /> 867 <br />Perdita Holtz: I’m a little fuzzy on a certain aspect of what you’ve discussed tonight; I hear that you want to attend 868 <br />the public hearing whether those are quorumed or not quorumed that you want to attend to hear the public. 869 <br /> 870 <br />Lisa Stuckey: But if they change it and they’re doing it six or eight times a year, are we really committed to that? 871 <br />I would be extremely skeptical. 872 <br /> 873 <br />Perdita Holtz: That is a question at this time, I don’t really think they are going to be changing the frequency but 874 <br />that’s just my feeling from what we’ve heard. 875 <br /> 876 <br />Bonnie Hammersley: I will support Perdita on that. One of the things we have is for the November 24th quarterly 877 <br />public hearing we don’t have any agenda items and so it’s difficult to try to justify adding more meetings so right now I 878 <br />don’t see that being the will of the Board to change it. 879 <br /> 880 <br />Perdita Holtz: I hear that you want to attend the public hearing what I’m fuzzy on is I’ve also heard that you want to 881 <br />do public meeting where the public can come to the Planning Board meeting and comment beforehand. There would 882 <br />be an official agenda item, we would send out notices to any affected property owners and they could come and talk 883 <br />with you. At that point, would you all make a recommendation at that Planning Board meeting and then attend the 884 <br />public hearing or do you still want to wait to make the recommendation after the public hearing? We’re just talking 885 <br />about legislative not quasi-judicial for this. What I am trying to clear on, because I have to write something up for the 886 <br />BOCC, is you want to attend the public hearing and you also want to have a pre-meeting where the public can come 887 <br />and attend. If it involved a piece of property the public is going to get mailed notices and we are going to put notices/ 888 <br />a sign saying come to the Planning Board meeting and let them know what you think. At that meeting will you all 889 <br />make a recommendation prior to the public hearing or do you want to wait until after the public hearing to make a 890 <br />recommendation? 891 <br /> 892 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: I think we can no more guarantee we can make a recommendation than the Commissioners can 893 <br />guarantee they can make a decision at the quarterly public hearing much as happened with the solar project. I think 894 <br />the best the Planning Board can do is to provide feedback based on our knowledge on the communities we come 895 <br />from and maybe comment on what people say and yes there is a bit of a challenge there because there may be time 896 <br />when all we can do is except that input and frankly there won’t be a whole lot we can say that is terribly intelligent 897 <br />other than thank you for the input. 898 <br /> 899 <br />Perdita Holtz: So after the public hearing you want to make a recommendation still so my concern is that on 900 <br />legislative items, that do not have a neighborhood information meeting, you are now adding an additional meeting 901 <br />before the public hearing that is going to make the process longer. I want to make sure that. 902 <br /> 903 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: I don’t think I was saying it that way. 904 <br /> 905 <br />Perdita Holtz: You’re having a Planning Board meeting that we are going to send out notices. 906 <br /> 907 <br />Craig Benedict: We’ll send out the letter out and decide. 908 <br /> 909 <br />Perdita Holtz: No, they’re saying they don’t want to decide, I know that is what we talked about two weeks ago but 910 <br />this is not what’s being talked about tonight. They want to wait to decide until after the public hearing. 911 <br /> 912 <br />35
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.