Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 090314
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2014
>
OCPB agenda 090314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 3:26:26 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 3:21:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/3/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 090314
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 3/5/14 <br />2 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: At this point, since this is the concept plan, which is reasonable. As we move forward, those 55 <br />covenants will be available. 56 <br /> 57 <br />David Lazzo: Yes sir, I am not sure what the rules are. 58 <br /> 59 <br />Michael Harvey: The preliminary plan application will require the applicant to file a preliminary set of covenants and 60 <br />deed restrictions for our review and comment. That is one of the conditions that this Board will be looking for. 61 <br /> 62 <br />Paul Guthrie: This storm water lot, have you envisioned what the gallon capacity will be? 63 <br /> 64 <br />David Lazzo: For fire protection? No not yet, that could be smaller or larger, it is a placeholder at this point as to 65 <br />where a good location is for that lot. 66 <br /> 67 <br />Paul Guthrie: Water and sewer, are you thinking about individual septic fields or a series of septic field that cover 68 <br />more than one property. 69 <br /> 70 <br />David Lazzo: At this point, we are looking at individual septic fields. 71 <br /> 72 <br />Paul Guthrie: Are you thinking of individual wells or some form of joint well production. 73 <br /> 74 <br />David Lazzo: On individual lots. 75 <br /> 76 <br />Paul Guthrie: On each lot, you will have a well and septic field? 77 <br /> 78 <br />David Lazzo: Yes. 79 <br /> 80 <br />Paul Guthrie: This is something you may want to pay attention to depending on the types of soils there are. 81 <br /> 82 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: I assumed there were preliminary perk tests done? 83 <br /> 84 <br />David Lazzo: That happens in the next stage. There are preliminary soil profiles available that lead us to make 85 <br />assumptions about the availability of septic soils. An actual survey by the health department will be done. 86 <br /> 87 <br />Michael Harvey: This project is based on 16 lots but there may be only 15 or 14 lots if there are no soils or there 88 <br />may an alternation of the existing layout to accommodation additional soil areas. 89 <br /> 90 <br />Paul Guthrie: Do you have any information as to what depth you have to go and what flows you can get? 91 <br /> 92 <br />David Lazzo: Not at this time. 93 <br /> 94 <br />Herman Staats: Reviewed location. 95 <br /> 96 <br />Johnny Randall: It looks like the forest is about 30 years old. Has any type of natural area inventory been done on 97 <br />this site? 98 <br /> 99 <br />Michael Harvey: Preliminary assessments have not indicated any natural or heritage sites. Obviously there will be 100 <br />a more in depth investigation. 101 <br /> 102 <br />Tony Blake: The streams empty into the Eno? 103 <br /> 104 <br />Michael Harvey: I would say yes. 105 <br /> 106 <br />Tony Blake: It appears there is source stream on one side, is that a stream? 107 <br /> 108 <br />48
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.