Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 070214
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2014
>
OCPB agenda 070214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 3:18:50 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 3:12:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/2/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 070214
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8—1 <br />Orange County Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan <br /> CHAPTER 8 - Economic, Health and Environmental Impacts of Parks and Recreation 8 <br />Economic, Health and Environmental <br />Impacts of Parks and Recreation <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />The provision of parks and open spaces, and of <br />recreation programs, events and opportunities, offer <br />a variety of benefits to the health safety and general <br />welfare of Orange County residents. Among these <br />are benefits to the county’s economy, to the overall <br />public health, and to the local and regional natural <br />environment. Evidence of those public benefits is <br />described below in two papers written by <br />consultants from the University of North Carolina – <br />Greensboro, supplemented with complementary <br />information received by DEAPR staff. <br /> <br />A. Economic Benefits of Parks, Recreation and <br /> Open Space <br />A 2011 study by the Trust for Public Land (TPL) <br />determined the return on North Carolina’s <br />investment in land conservation through its four <br />conservation trust funds. The TPL study found that <br />every $1 invested returns $4 in economic value <br />from the kinds of natural resource goods and <br />services, such as water quality protection by <br />wetlands and air pollution removal by forests. The <br />study did not, however, include how investments in <br />land conservation benefit the economy through <br />jobs, taxes, tourism, and other revenue.1 <br /> <br />Locally, a comprehensive review of those benefits <br />was conducted for Orange County by a team of <br />researchers from the University of North Carolina at <br />Greensboro. Their findings, as well as the national <br />research mentioned previously, support the idea <br />that although county budgets need to be cut during <br />economic downturns, “…preserving parks and <br />recreation funds can actually reduce the need to <br />allocate funding to other public departments.”2 <br /> <br />The benefits that parks, recreation, and open space <br />have on individuals and communities are well <br />documented. Numerous studies have examined the <br />positive impacts that parks and recreation participa- <br />tion has on a person’s physical and psychological <br />health and wellbeing. In recent years, increased <br />research has focused on the impact of parks, recrea- <br />tion, and open space on a community’s economy. <br />“At the bottom line, parks are a good financial <br />investment for a community.”3 <br /> <br />The following are ways that parks, recreation, and <br />open space positively benefit the economic health <br />of our cities, states, and country. <br /> <br />Enhances residential property values <br /> <br />Research consistently shows <br />parks have a positive impact on <br />the value of properties located <br />close by. Studies further demon- <br />strate that many people will pay <br />more for a home that is located- <br />near a park, a nature preserve, or community open <br />space. Economists call this influence hedonic value <br />while real estate agents and homebuilders call it <br />‘location, location, location.’ Determining the <br />correlation between parks and property values is <br />not a recent phenomenon. According to a report of <br />the American Planning Association, “From 1856 to <br />1873 he [Frederick Law Olmsted] tracked the value <br />of property adjacent to Central Park, in order to jus- <br />tify the $13 million spent on its creation. He found <br />that over the 17-year period there was a $209 <br />million dollar increase in the value of property <br />impacted by the park.”4 <br /> <br />85
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.