Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />PLANNING <br />STAFF <br />RECOMMENDED <br />FINDINGS <br /> EVIDENCE SUBMITTED <br />TO SUPPORT <br />FINDINGS <br />PLANNING <br />BOARD <br />FINDINGS <br />Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (b) <br /> <br />The use will maintain or <br />enhance the value of <br />contiguous property (unless <br />the use is a public <br />necessity, in which case <br />the use need not maintain <br />or enhance the value of <br />contiguous property). <br /> <br /> Based on evidence <br />presented at the hearing <br />including: <br /> <br />i. Staff abstract and <br />attachments, <br />including the SUP <br />application and site <br />plan. <br />ii. Staff testimony on the <br />project’s compliance <br />with the UDO from <br />the Public Hearing <br />and the March/April <br />Planning Board <br />meetings. <br />iii. Applicant testimony <br />from Mr. Louis <br />Iannone, Mr. Bret <br />Niemann, Mr. Gabriel <br />Cantor, and Mr. <br />Richard Kirkland, on <br />how the project <br />complied with the <br />UDO including the <br />affidavit entered into <br />the record at the <br />Public Hearing and <br />written <br />correspondence <br />submitted to the <br />March and April <br />Planning Board <br />meetings. This <br />included a real estate <br />evaluation indicating <br />the project would not <br />have an impact on <br />adjacent property <br />value. <br /> <br /> Will __Will <br />Not <br />36