Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) SPECIAL USE – GENERAL STANDARDS CLASS A SPECIAL ("Yes" indicates <br />compliance; "No" indicates non-compliance) <br /> <br />PLANNING <br />STAFF <br />RECOMMENDED <br />FINDINGS <br /> EVIDENCE SUBMITTED <br />TO SUPPORT <br />FINDINGS <br />PLANNING <br />BOARD <br />FINDINGS <br />In accordance with Section <br />5.3.2 (A) (2), the Board of <br />Commissioners shall also <br />consider the following <br />general conditions before <br />the application for a <br />Special Use can be <br />approved: <br /> <br /> ** NOTE – staff <br />does not make <br />specific <br />recommendations <br />with respect to <br />these findings ** <br /> <br />Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (a) <br /> <br />The use will maintain or <br />promote the public health, <br />safety and general welfare, <br />if located where proposed <br />and developed and <br />operated according to the <br />plan as submitted. <br /> <br /> Based on evidence <br />presented at the hearing <br />including: <br /> <br />i. Staff abstract and <br />attachments, <br />including the SUP <br />application and site <br />plan. <br />ii. Staff testimony on the <br />project’s compliance <br />with the UDO from <br />the Public Hearing <br />and the March/April <br />Planning Board <br />meetings. <br />iii. Applicant testimony <br />from Mr. Louis <br />Iannone, Mr. Bret <br />Niemann, Mr. Gabriel <br />Cantor, and Mr. <br />Richard Kirkland, on <br />how the project <br />complied with the <br />UDO including the <br />affidavit entered into <br />the record at the <br />Public Hearing and <br />written <br />correspondence <br />submitted to the <br />March and April <br />Planning Board <br />meetings. <br />iv. Adjacent property <br />owner e-mails and <br />applicant responses. <br />Comments from the <br />BOCC, Planning <br />Board, and the <br />general public. <br /> <br /> Will __Will <br />Not <br />35