Orange County NC Website
<br /> <br />Planning Director’s Recommendation: The Planning Director recommends denial of the request <br />based on the following: <br />1. There is nothing inherently significant about the EDE-2 general use zoning district <br />mandating kennel operations be allowed to observe a ‘different’ setback requirement <br />from other non-residential general use zoning districts, where Class II Kennels are <br />allowed, throughout the County. <br />2. Permitted uses within the EDE-2 zoning district include: <br />a. Offices, <br />b. Retail (i.e. restaurants, retail sales, etc.), <br />c. Financial offices/uses (i.e. bank, finance agency, credit agency, brokerage house, <br />etc.) <br />d. Government uses, <br />e. Manufacturing, Assembly, and Processing operations, <br />f. Services (i.e. assembly uses, barber/beauty shops, funeral home, health care, <br />music/dance schools, day care, etc.) <br />g. Wholesale trade operations. <br />These uses have been deemed ‘permitted by right’ meaning they are reviewed and acted <br />upon by staff through the review of a site plan. <br />There are other uses, including Class II Kennels, allowed in the district where the County <br />has determined they are required to go through a heightened level of permit review (i.e. a <br />Special Use Permit process acted upon by either the Board of Adjustment or County <br />Commissioners) to ensure the use is compatible with the surrounding area. <br />These uses are required to adhere to additional development restrictions, including <br />increased setbacks, to address potential impacts on adjacent properties in an effort to <br />ensure there are no adverse impacts. <br />While some of the allowable permitted uses may not be concerned over the proximity of a <br />kennel operation to a common property line, some might. Staff is concerned this may <br />limit the marketability of adjacent, undeveloped, properties. <br />3. Staff is concerned reducing the required setback to 25 feet will increase ‘complaints’ <br />related to the operational characteristics of a kennel and its impacts on adjacent property <br />development/redevelopment. <br />4. Staff is not convinced the 25 foot setback currently required for ‘permitted land uses’ <br />within the EDE-2 general use zoning district will provide sufficient separation from a <br />kennel operation and adjacent properties to ensure protection from ‘adverse impacts’ as <br />required under Section 5.6.5 (A) (2) (a) of the UDO. <br />If there is a recommendation to approve this item, staff would suggest the Board consider a <br />revised version of the amendment contained in Attachment 3 of this abstract. Staff has taken <br />the liberty of modifying the applicant’s proposal to make it consistent with existing UDO <br />formatting and ensured the proposed standards are only applicable to Class II Kennels <br />developed within the EDE-2 general use zoning district as proposed by the applicant. <br /> <br />89