Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 030514
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2014
>
OCPB agenda 030514
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 2:47:18 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 2:42:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/5/2014
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 030514
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pete Hallenbeck: At this point, since this is the concept plan, which is reasonable. As we move forward, those 109 <br />covenants will be available. 110 <br /> 111 <br />David Lazzo: Yes sir, I am not sure what the rules are. 112 <br /> 113 <br />Michael Harvey: The preliminary plan application will require the applicant to file a preliminary set of covenants and 114 <br />deed restrictions for our review and comment. That is one of the conditions that this Board will be looking for. 115 <br /> 116 <br />Paul Guthrie: This storm water lot, have you envisioned what the gallon capacity will be? 117 <br /> 118 <br />David Lazzo: For fire protection? No not yet, that could be smaller or larger, it is a placeholder at this point as to 119 <br />where a good location is for that lot. 120 <br /> 121 <br />Paul Guthrie: Water and sewer, are you thinking about individual septic fields or a series of septic field that cover 122 <br />more than one property. 123 <br /> 124 <br />David Lazzo: At this point, we are looking at individual septic fields. 125 <br /> 126 <br />Paul Guthrie: Are you thinking of individual wells or some form of joint well production. 127 <br /> 128 <br />David Lazzo: On individual lots. 129 <br /> 130 <br />Paul Guthrie: On each lot, you will have a well and septic field? 131 <br /> 132 <br />David Lazzo: Yes. 133 <br /> 134 <br />Paul Guthrie: This is something you may want to pay attention to depending on the types of soils there are. 135 <br /> 136 <br />Pete Hallenbeck: I assumed there were preliminary perk tests done? 137 <br /> 138 <br />David Lazzo: That happens in the next stage. There are preliminary soil profiles available that lead us to make 139 <br />assumptions about the availability of septic soils. An actual survey by the health department will be done. 140 <br /> 141 <br />Michael Harvey: This project is based on 16 lots but there may be only 15 or 14 lots if there are no soils or there 142 <br />may an alternation of the existing layout to accommodation additional soil areas. 143 <br /> 144 <br />Paul Guthrie: Do you have any information as to what depth you have to go and what flows you can get? 145 <br /> 146 <br />David Lazzo: Not at this time. 147 <br /> 148 <br />Herman Staats: Reviewed location. 149 <br /> 150 <br />Johnny Randall: It looks like the forest is about 30 years old. Has any type of natural area inventory been done on 151 <br />this site? 152 <br /> 153 <br />Michael Harvey: Preliminary assessments have not indicated any natural or heritage sites. Obviously there will be 154 <br />a more in depth investigation. 155 <br /> 156 <br />Tony Blake: The streams empty into the Eno? 157 <br /> 158 <br />Michael Harvey: I would say yes. 159 <br /> 160 <br />Tony Blake: It appears there is source stream on one side, is that a stream? 161 <br /> 162 <br />7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.