Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
4 <br /> <br />The Board member asked if previously denied applications could re- <br />apply based on the change in voting standards. <br />STAFF RESPONSE: Section 2.2.8 of the UDO prohibits the submittal <br />of: ‘the same or similar amendment, affecting the same property or a <br />portion of it’ for a period of 1 year from the date of denial. <br />Applicants who have had their Class B Special Use Permit requests <br />denied will have to wait the required 1 year to re-file the application, <br />which would then be subject to these revised voting standards. The <br />change in voting provisions, however, does not impact the ability of a <br />‘denied’ application to be re-filed in advance of established time limits. <br />This is somewhat of a moot point as there has not been a Class B <br />Special Use Permit application denied by the Board of Adjustment that <br />could take advantage of the new voting standard. <br />3. Both the County Attorney and staff indicated they did not believe the <br />changes would have a direct impact on the submittal of variance or <br />special use permit applications. <br />Staff indicated there had been only 1 variance case reviewed by the <br />Board of Adjustment in the last 4 years. <br />Agenda materials from the public hearing can be viewed at: <br />http://orangecountync.gov/occlerks/131125.pdf. <br /> <br />January 23, 2014 - Receive Planning Board recommendation. <br /> <br />d. Other <br /> <br /> <br />2. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM <br />Mission/Scope: Public Hearing process consistent with NC State Statutes and <br />Orange County ordinance requirements <br /> <br />a. Planning Board Review: <br />October 2, 2013 – Ordinance Review Committee (ORC). <br />This item was reviewed at the October 2, 2013 ORC meeting where there <br />were no comments from Board members. <br />December 4, 2013 – Recommendation <br /> <br /> <br />b. Advisory Boards: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />c. Local Government Review: <br /> <br />98