OCPB agenda 110613 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Implementation Bridge - Future Phase Suggestions Planning Staff Comment 16.Cluster development standards for suburban versus rural developments. Users should keep in mind that it is difficult to cluster development that is not located on public water and sewer systems (or community well and package treatment systems; package treatment systems are not currently permitted in rural areas of the county). 17.Need updated Airport Regulations. 18.Regulating adult entertainment uses and nuisance related events at these uses. 19.Airport zoning, possibly as conditional zoning district. 20.Review telecommunications towers process.Staff considers this to be COMPLETED with the Telecom amendments that were adopted on May 1, 2012. 21. Section 2.5.3, No mention of lighting, natural areas inventory, solid waste, or centralized recycling in requirements for information as applications are submitted. Should be added. 22.Include hours of operation. Lighting comes to mind -- Section 5.14.2 (A) (1) 23.Add no fault well repair to requirements. 24.Need to revisit private road standards. 25. There's a lack of land use criteria for reserving school sites. Need some general guidelines (i.e. not in wetlands or on slopes greater than X). Consult County School Joint Construction Standards. 26.Relation to adjacent properties is not addressed -- Section 7.13.3 (C) (1) 27.Is there any limit to building height? Flag for future. The amendments pertaining to economic development that were adopted on February 7, 2012 set a maximum height limit (see Section 6.2.2) 28.Are there provisions for shared driveways? It may be useful in certain cases (i.e. along highways/major roadways). The Efland-Cheeks Overlay District (ECOD) has provisions for shared driveways. Additionally, the two new Efland area zoning overlay districts (to be reconsidered at the Feb 2014 QPH) have provisions for shared driveways. 81