Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 100213
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2013
>
OCPB agenda 100213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 2:20:55 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 2:14:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/2/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 100213
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff Comment: The Orange County 2030 Comprehensive Plan defines the Node as <br />follows: <br />Land near major transportation routes that could be provided with public <br />water and wastewater services and is appropriate for retail and other <br />commercial uses; manufacturing and other industrial uses; office and <br />limited (not to exceed 25% of any Node) higher density residential uses. <br />2. A BOCC member asked staff to explain why there was residentially zoned property within <br />the Node. There was concern over the potential impact of the rezoning on the continued <br />use of these properties to support residential land uses. <br />Staff Comment: The aforementioned definition of the Node indicates ‘higher intensity <br />residential uses’ are acceptable for ‘limited’ development in the area. As a result there is, <br />and will continue to be, general use residential zoning designations throughout the Node. <br />Underlying zoning was not changed with the establishment of the Node (i.e. up-zoning) <br />and assumes as development conditions are favorable to allowing additional non- <br />residential development, properties could be rezoned appropriately. <br />While staff understands the concern, the UDO contains development standards designed <br />to offset potential impacts (i.e. setbacks, land use buffers, performance standards, etc.). <br />It should be noted, in accordance with Section 5.2.1 Table of Permitted Uses of the UDO, <br />single-family residences are a permitted use of property within the: <br />a. Local Commercial (LC-1) <br />b. Neighborhood Commercial (NC-2) <br />c. Community Commercial (CC-3) <br />d. Existing Commercial (EC-5) <br />e. Office Institutional (OI) – multi-family residences only (i.e. a building or lot <br />containing 3 or more dwelling units) <br />f. Economic Development Eno Lower Intensity (EDE-1) <br />g. Economic Development Hillsborough Limited Office with Residential (EDH-3) <br />non-residential general use zoning districts. <br />Attachment 2 contains the Land Use and Zoning Matrix denoting the various appropriate <br />general use zoning districts for each land use classification. <br />Attachment 5 contains an educational/information item providing additional information on <br />the various general use zoning districts. <br />3. A BOCC member asked staff to clarify what land use buffer would be required on the 2 <br />parcels if they were rezoned and developed for industrial use. <br />Staff Comment: Section 6.8.6 of the UDO provides for a variable width buffer based on <br />the zoning of adjacent property. The typical land use buffer of an I-1 zoned property <br />located adjacent to an R-1 zoned property is 100 feet. <br />4. A BOCC member asked if the expansion of the existing sheet metal fabrication operation <br />at 3604 Southern Drive would negatively impact adjacent properties. <br />24
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.