Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 090413
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2013
>
OCPB agenda 090413
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 2:14:36 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 2:13:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/4/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 090413
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D R A F T <br /> <br />1 <br />SUMMARY NOTES 1 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD 2 JULY 10, 2013 3 <br />ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE 4 <br /> 5 <br />NOTE: A quorum is not required for Ordinance Review Committee meetings. 6 <br /> 7 MEMBERS PRESENT: Peter Hallenbeck (Chair), Cheeks Township Representative; Stephanie O’Rourke, Eno Township 8 <br />Representative; Tony Blake, Bingham Township Representative; Herman Staats, At-Large, Cedar Grove Township; James 9 <br />Lea, Cedar Grove Township Representative; Paul Guthrie, At-Large, Chapel Hill Township 10 11 <br /> 12 STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor; Perdita Holtz, Special 13 <br />Projects Coordinator; Ashley Moncado, Special Projects Planner; Tina Love, Administrative Assistant II 14 <br /> 15 <br /> 16 AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 17 18 19 AGENDA ITEM 2: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (UDO) TEXT AMENDMENTS –GOVERNMENTAL USES 20 <br /> To review and comment upon proposed revisions to the UDO to require that the site plan review 21 <br />process for governmental uses include a neighborhood information meeting. 22 Presenter: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor 23 24 <br />Mr. Harvey reviewed abstract. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Tony Blake: Is this a conflict of interest for me? I have no financial interest but it is directly related to the substation we are 27 <br />trying to build. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Michael Harvey: I don’t think you have a conflict. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Tony Blake: How does this affect the plan in progress? 32 <br /> 33 <br />Michael Harvey: If your site plan has already been submitted then you won’t have to follow this process. If it is adopted and 34 <br />your site plan has not been submitted then you will need to follow this process. With due respect to White Cross Volunteer 35 <br />Fire Department, Commissioner Jacobs has indicated his preference for a meeting to be held no matter what to address some 36 <br />of the concerns of the local residents. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Craig Benedict: I would work with the attorneys to put a provision in on the effective date, what this applies to, like a clause 39 <br />that says that anything from a certain date that it applies to. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Tony Blake: This is one of the volunteer organizations and we don’t have the time or wherewithal to host a public meeting so 42 <br />would the county be hosting this meeting for us in a volunteer situation? 43 <br /> 44 <br />Michael Harvey: The ordinance says we will assist with scheduling the meeting but we are not assuming the liability or cost 45 <br />for advertisements or informing the citizens. There is nothing in the code that says you can’t use county facilities. 46 <br /> 47 <br />Tony Blake: Typically the public hearings are run by the county. 48 <br /> 49 <br />Michael Harvey: This isn’t a public hearing just a neighborhood information meeting to inform the local residents as to what is 50 <br />being proposed. 51 <br /> 52 <br />Tony Blake: Is the outcome of this meeting a decision as to whether to proceed or not? 53 <br />5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.