Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
DRAFT 1 <br /> 2 <br />MINUTES 3 <br /> ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 4 <br />ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD 5 <br />QUARTERLY PUBLIC HEARING 6 <br />February 25, 2013 7 <br />7:00 P.M. 8 <br /> 9 <br /> 10 <br />The Orange County Board of Commissioners and the Orange County Planning Board 11 <br />met for a Quarterly Public Hearing on Monday, February 25, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. at the 12 <br />Department of Social Services, 113 Mayo Street, Hillsborough, N.C. 13 <br /> 14 <br />COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair Barry Jacobs and Commissioners Mark 15 <br />Dorosin, Alice Gordon, Earl McKee, Bernadette Pelissier, Renee Price and Penny Rich 16 <br />COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: 17 <br />COUNTY ATTORNEY PRESENT: John Roberts 18 <br />COUNTY STAFF PRESENT: County Manager Frank Clifton and Deputy Clerk to the Board 19 <br />David Hunt (All other staff members will be identified appropriately below) 20 <br />PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Pete Hallenbeck, and Planning Board 21 <br />members Tony Blake, Rachel Phelps Hawkins, Alan Campbell, Maxecine Mitchell, 22 <br />Johnny Randall, H.T. “Buddy” Hartley, and Herman Staats 23 <br />PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Dawn Brezina, Larry Wright, Andrea Rohrbacher 24 <br />and Lisa Stuckey 25 <br /> 26 <br /> 27 <br />A. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 28 <br /> 29 <br />1. 1. Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendment – To review government-30 <br />initiated amendments to the text of the UDO to modify existing language to provide additional 31 <br />reference to land disturbance thresholds related to stormwater management standards. The 32 <br />purpose of this amendment is to avoid requiring project applicants to submit multiple, 33 <br />professionally prepared, and plans for a single development project. 34 <br /> 35 <br />FEBRUARY 25, 2013 36 <br />QUAR TERLY PUBLIC HEARING 37 <br />AGENDA ITEM:C-1 38 <br />UDO TEXT AMENDMENT – SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS 39 <br />BACKGROUND: 40 <br />• On April 17, 2012 the BOCC approved mandated State stormwater management and 41 <br />nutrient reduction rules/strategies. 42 <br />• Need clearer standards in our site plan review/approval procedures section. 43 <br />• Correct inconsistencies regarding when formal, professionally prepared, site plan is 44 <br />required versus a plot plan prepared by applicant. 45 <br />WHAT THIS PROPOSAL DOES: 46 <br />Attachment 4 <br />Excerpt of Draft February 25, 2013 <br />Quarterly Public Hearing minutes <br />33