Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 040313
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2013
>
OCPB agenda 040313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 2:08:28 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 2:06:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/3/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 040313
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> <br />plan into the proposed text. This BOCC member indicated she felt <br />language within a footnote ought to be incorporated to provide additional <br />‘explanation’ on the need for the amendment. <br />STAFF COMMENT: Staff does not believe additional modification <br />is necessary. <br />When the UDO was developed there was a conscious effort to <br />eliminate explanatory language in an effort to streamline existing <br />regulations and condense existing land use regulations. <br />The UDO is not intended to serve as a technical manual providing <br />detailed insight into every ‘standard’ associated with a given <br />development. It is, ultimately, staff’s responsibility to educate local <br />residents and developers with respect to the rationale behind a <br />given regulation. <br />Unless specifically directed by the BOCC to begin re-inserting <br />explanatory language, staff recommends keeping the language <br />regulatory in nature. <br />9. While there was no formal consensus, a few BOCC members favored <br />leaving language within the UDO requiring submission of a professionally <br />prepared site plan for property located only within the University Lake <br />Watershed Protection Overlay District. <br />Other BOCC members expressed support for eliminating the requirement <br />altogether and basing the need for a formal site plan on established land <br />disturbance thresholds for stormwater management plans. <br />10. Staff was directed to solicit comments on the proposal from OWASA to <br />ascertain if they have any concerns. <br />STAFF COMMENT: Staff has contacted OWASA who has <br />expressed no concern over the proposal. For more information <br />please refer to Attachment 3. <br />c. BOCC Updates/Checkpoints <br />January 9, 2013 - BOCC members can view materials to be reviewed by the <br />Planning Board’s Ordinance Advisory Committee (ORC) as part of the <br />Planning Board materials posted on-line each month. Packet materials <br />can be viewed utilizing the following <br />link: http://orangecountync.gov/planning/documents/PBPacketJan2013.p <br />df <br />February 5, 2013 – BOCC members approved the legal advertisement for the <br />February 25, 2013 Quarterly Public Hearing with this item on the agenda. <br />May 7, 2013 - Receive Planning Board recommendation. <br />d. Other <br /> <br /> <br />2. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM <br />Mission/Scope: Public Hearing process consistent with NC State Statutes and <br />22
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.