Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 010913
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2013
>
OCPB agenda 010913
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 2:01:50 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 1:58:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/9/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 010913
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 4 <br />Because the UDO has been amended since these comments were made, referenced sections may be slightly off as some portions of the UDO have been <br />renumbered. <br />20 <br />Implementation Bridge - Future Phase Suggestions Planning Staff Comment <br />79. <br />Mention Water and Sewer Management and Planning Boundary <br />Agreement. Any system should be designed, planned, constructed <br />and maintained by the responsible entity as assigned through the <br />Agreement -- Section 7.13.4 (C) (1) (b) <br />80. <br />[Staff note: the comments in sage-colored boxes were made by <br />Animal Services staff] As I suspect you know, the <br />County’s Animal Control Ordinance includes kennel definitions and <br />a permitting process for Class I and Class II Kennels. The County’s <br />Zoning Ordinance also includes kennel definitions and process for <br />a kennel (or stable) to obtain a special use permit (which requires <br />one or possibly both of the permits issued Animal Control). <br />Planning staff believes the processes have been 'better coordinated' with <br />the approval of a UDO text amendment package in January of 2012. A <br />kennel is now a separate land use category from a stable. <br />81.There is a need to better coordinate (and dare I say, unify) these <br />ordinances. Some of the issues in regard to kennels include: <br />Planning staff believes the processes have been 'better coordinated' with <br />the approval of a UDO text amendment package in January of 2012. The <br />inherant problem is that one process is a land use management process <br />(Planning) and the other is focused on the care of the animal (Animal <br />Services). While we have addressed the majority of identified <br />contradictions, most notably the definitions, our processes will always be <br />somewhat unique given our different roles and responsibilities. <br />82.Different definitions of Class I and Class II permits Addressed by previous UDO text amendment approved in January of <br />2012 - Staff considers this item COMPLETE. <br />83.A lack of clarity as to whether a special use permit is required for <br />Class I as well as Class II kennel <br />Addressed by previous UDO text amendment approved in January of <br />2012 - Staff considers this item COMPLETE. <br />78
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.