Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 010913
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2013
>
OCPB agenda 010913
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 2:01:50 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 1:58:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/9/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 010913
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 4 <br />Because the UDO has been amended since these comments were made, referenced sections may be slightly off as some portions of the UDO have been <br />renumbered. <br />18 <br />Implementation Bridge - Future Phase Suggestions Planning Staff Comment <br />63. <br />It would be really nice if the final document could be accessed and <br />indexed electronically rather than printed, a hyperlink format. For <br />instance, clicking on a term and the definition pops up. <br />The UDO has been available on-line in a PDF bookmarked format since <br />shortly after its adoption. The County recently made the decision to <br />begin to use MuniCode to maintain its ordinances so the UDO will soon <br />be converted to MuniCode's format. It is staff's understanding that some <br />hyperlinking may be part of MuniCode's format. <br />64.Identifying Comprehensive Plan policies that relate to UDO <br />updates. <br />All amendments that have been made to the UDO have included specific <br />Comprehensive Plan policies that support the amendment. <br />65. <br />No mention of Town of Hillsborough interlocal agreement. Add a <br />footnote or a new section. [Note: references to the Orange County- <br />Hillsborough Interlocal Agreement should be added when <br />Zoning/UDO-related items are formally adopted. At this point, <br />neither a joint land use plan nor joint development regulations <br />have been adopted]. <br />Work on a joint land use plan was initiated in September 2012. Text will <br />be added to the UDO as necessary as items move through the adoption <br />process. <br />66.Section 1.6.2 (A), Is a 1-year hiatus long enough? <br />67.Section 1.7.2, "Agriculture" should be mentioned somewhere <br />within the discussion of elements. <br />68.Section 2.2.7 (C), Why treat withdrawal of an application as <br />denial? <br />69.Section 2.2.8 (A), Shouldn't have to wait a year if withdrawn. 6- <br />months for withdrawal and 1-year for denial? <br />70.Section 2.15.3 (C) (4).- There is no deadline for agencies to <br />respond. <br />71.Section 2.15.2 (C) (5) - Not applicable if flexible development <br />option used. <br />72.Section 2.17, Need a process other than that of a major <br />subdivision for recombining existing lots. <br />76
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.