Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 010913
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2013
>
OCPB agenda 010913
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 2:01:50 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 1:58:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/9/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 010913
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 4 <br />Because the UDO has been amended since these comments were made, referenced sections may be slightly off as some portions of the UDO have been <br />renumbered. <br />2 <br />Implementation Bridge - Future Phase Suggestions Planning Staff Comment <br />page 12 <br />Review and adjust notification requirements to make more <br />appropriate to rural vs. suburban areas. (E.g., rural rezonings may <br />require larger areas of notification. <br />Staff recommends that notification requirements remain as written as <br />rural rezonings do not have a greater area of immediate impact when <br />compared to suburban/urban rezonings. The County's notification <br />procedures comply with State statutes and include sign posting(s) and <br />newspaper advertisements in addition to mailed letters to property <br />owners within 500 feet of a parcel proposed for rezoning. <br />page 12 Revisit Conditional District provisions to consider restricting <br />locations in which they can be applied. <br />Because of adjustments made to conditional districts near the end of the <br />adoption process, this item is DONE. <br />page 12 Revisit home occupation rules. <br />page 12 Exclude government or municipal uses from residential zoning. <br />It is common zoning practice to allow public uses in residential zoning <br />districts. Staff does not recommend that government uses be excluded <br />from the residential zoning districts. Several years ago some government <br />uses required issuance of an SUP but due to case law that discouraged <br />governments from issuing themselves SUPs, the requirement was <br />removed. <br />page 12 <br />Add back language about required findings that was formerly <br />included for Planned Developments in the existing Zoning <br />Ordinance. <br />Staff believes the language is properly referenced within the Conditional <br />Use, Conditional Zoning, and Special Use Permitting processes and there <br />is no need to add repetitive language back into the UDO. <br />page 12 Differentiate between urban and rural character for regulations <br />such as signage and subdivision standards. <br />page 12 <br />Review the full range of design standards that are currently <br />included in the UDO, to determine if adjustments would help to <br />promote County goals and objectives. (Note: the Appendix <br />contains 22 specific suggestions for review of standards such as <br />building height, lighting, signs, adult entertainment uses, road and <br />driveway requirements, hours of operation, and airport zoning.) <br />Environmental Ideas <br />60
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.