Browse
Search
OCPB agenda 010913
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2013
>
OCPB agenda 010913
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2018 2:01:50 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 1:58:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/9/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
OCPB minutes 010913
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 4 <br />Because the UDO has been amended since these comments were made, referenced sections may be slightly off as some portions of the UDO have been <br />renumbered. <br />1 <br />Implementation Bridge - Future Phase Suggestions Planning Staff Comment <br />Economic Development Ideas <br />page 11 <br />Streamline procedures for Economic Development Districts and <br />commercial development applications. Consider expedited <br />processing for such applications. <br />Significant amendments pertaining economic development were <br />adopted on February 7, 2012. Staff recommends waiting to re-evaluate <br />the process until after a project has been processed under the revised <br />regulations. <br />page 11 <br />Study what local private businesses need in order to expand and <br />thrive, and consider what regulatory changes could contribute to <br />that objective. <br />page 11 Consider different standards for application within Economic <br />Development Districts to encourage commercial development. <br />Significant amendments pertaining economic development were <br />adopted on February 7, 2012. Staff recommends waiting to re-evaluate <br />the process until after a project has been processed under the revised <br />regulations. Standards in the EDDs are still more rigorous than standards <br />in the Commercial and Commercial-Industrial Transition Nodes. It may <br />be desirable to review whether the standards should be different. <br />page 11 Create a predictable process for consideration of development <br />applications within Economic Development Districts. <br />Significant amendments pertaining economic development were <br />adopted on February 7, 2012. Staff recommends waiting to re-evaluate <br />the process until after a project has been processed under the revised <br />regulations. <br />page 11 Develop regulations for Rural Economic Development Areas. <br />A REDA conditional zoning district was adopted for the NC57/Speedway <br />area on June 5, 2012. Additional rural economic development areas are <br />not being contemplated at this time and are not supported by existing <br />small area plans. <br />Permitted Uses and Standards Ideas <br />page 12 <br />Differentiate between suburban and rural character, and adjust <br />regulations relating to required features such as signing and <br />transportation improvements. <br />Note: The ideas in the main body of the Implementation Bridge also appear in the Appendix, although they may be worded differently or <br />may combine several separate comments into one idea. <br />59
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.