OCPB agenda 010913 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

A-7 70. Section 2.15.3 (C) (4).- There is no deadline for agencies to respond. 71. Section 2.15.2 (C) (5) - Not applicable if flexible development option used. 72. Section 2.17, Need a process other than that of a major subdivision for recombining existing lots. 73. Need language that will differentiate between the different types of residential zoning districts. 74. Regarding Impervious Surface Ratios and Sliding Scales, the two tables should be combined into one. Need to understand ramifications of any proposed changes -- Section 4.2.5. 75. Some home occupations are permitted but not associated storage? This needs clarification. 76. Kennels and Riding Stables should be addressed separately. Should they require a Class A or Class B Special Use Permit? 77. Clarify how open space areas of golf courses are counted towards meeting ordinance requirements. 78. Change to require a to Class "A" Special Use Permit, which would require BOCC approval rather than Board of Adjustment -- Section 5.9.5 79. Mention Water and Sewer Management and Planning Boundary Agreement. Any system should be designed, planned, constructed and maintained by the responsible entity as assigned through the Agreement -- Section 7.13.4 (C) (1) (b) 80. As I suspect you know, the County’s Animal Control Ordinance includes kennel definitions and a permitting process for Class I and Class II Kennels. The County’s Zoning Ordinance also includes kennel definitions and process for a kennel (or stable) to obtain a special use permit (which requires one or possibly both of the permits issued Animal Control). 81. There is a need to better coordinate (and dare I say, unify) these ordinances. Some of the issues in regard to kennels include: 82. Different definitions of Class I and Class II permits 83. A lack of clarity as to whether a special use permit is required for Class I as well as Class II kennel 84. A lack of clarity as to whether a special use permit is required for Class I under the Animal Control as well as the Zoning Ordinance 85. Possible process improvements in the permitting process for kennels requiring a special use permit. 86. Also, I think we should consider whether site plans for “riding stables/academies” should be subject to review by Animal Control. One concern is the availability of staff expertise in this area. Another concern is that there are no specific stable standards in the County’s Animal Control Ordinances. By contrast, there are such standards for kennels which require permitting. 87. Clarify provisions for Outdoor events/activities, festivals, etc. 88. Review language regarding Principal Uses and Principal Structures (Arti 50