BOA minutes 121012 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 6/10/2013 OC Board of Adjustment – 12/10/2012 Page 3 of 6 1 Sahana Ayer: On page 19, line 1012 should read, “….on the property. So it is”. Line 1016 2 should read, “…has to comply with DENR…” 3 4 Brian Ferrell: On page 19, line 1003 should read, “…are hearing is a legal argument and she 5 has one view and the county has one view of a legal interpretation.” Line 1004 should read, 6 “Obviously, if there is a contrary view…” 7 8 Steve Keadey: On page 20, line 1079 should read, “We agree with the decision that was 9 made and that has been approved.” 10 11 Sahana Ayer: On page 20, line 1067 should read, “…septic system. The Board of 12 Adjustment has no authority to comment on the compliance…” Line 1071 should read, 13 “…does not have the authority to regulate it and that is the situation here. We are talking…”. 14 15 Michael Harvey: On page 20, line 1076 should read, “I have been advised by counsel to only 16 respond to questions from the board or cross examination.” 17 18 Brian Ferrell: On page 22, line 1201 should read, “…heard some about tonight that deal with 19 what does the statute mean…”. On page 23, line 1208 should read, “Essentially, the issue of 20 the Davidson County versus High Point case was whether or not a sewage treatment plant 21 was subject to the zoning authority…”. Line 1213 should read, “…counties are allowed to put 22 together for public good. Examples of public enterprises are sewage…”. Line 1221 should 23 read, “…the Rocky Mount Board of Adjustment decision. In that case you had a school that 24 had a building…”. Line 1242 should read, “…those previous iterations, it appears from the 25 record, they were subject to the zoning jurisdiction…” 26 27 David Blankfard: On page 24, lines 1269 and 1270 should read, “The one about the building, 28 a sewage treatment plant is not considered a building; I have issue with the fact that if it has 29 four walls and a roof. It is a building structure.” 30 31 Brian Ferrell: On page 24, line 1283 should read, “…have here that zoning is not applicable 32 at all. The County’s argument is we don’t have the authority to regulate this if we wanted…”. 33 Line 1306 should read, “…determinations, nobody attempted to appeal them. Whether or 34 not they could be appealed is another…”. Line 1309 should read, “…determinations was 35 made prior to the UDO. In my view, what is before you, is the appeal you see on this case”. 36 Line 1317 should read, “…have an appeal from those actions. Your question is, do four fifths 37 of you believe, in order to…”. Line 1308 should read, “required pursuant to your UDO or the 38 then in effect zoning ordinance assuming that one of those…”. 39 40 David Blankfard: On page 24, line 1289 should read, “…treatment plant then or was that just 41 a proposed modification or was it already done?” 42 43 Michael Harvey: On page 25, line 1338 and line 1339 should read, “I would call the board’s 44 attention to the November 2010 letter that articulates the county staff’s opinion…” 45 46