|
Approved 6/10/2013
<br />OC Board of Adjustment – 12/10/2012 Page 2 of 6
<br />Brian Ferrell: On page 6, line 315 should read, “…to prosecute an appeal.” On page 7, line 1
<br />368 should read, “…alternatively because he is a member of the association. If he is, and 2
<br />maybe we will hear from him, or Preserve Rural Orange. If he is a member of the 3
<br />association…” Line 380 should read, …of the approval at issue, that they have some …”. 4
<br />On page 8, line 410 should read, “…should have the opportunity to rebut the testimony that 5
<br />is offered. The limits…” 6
<br /> 7
<br />Sahana Ayer: On page 8, line 439 should read, “…represents the interests of the Orange 8
<br />County Residents...”. 9
<br /> 10
<br />Brian Ferrell: On page 9, line 484 should read, “…the arguments directly on standing and 11
<br />decide not to move forward. But should you want…”. 12
<br /> 13
<br />Sahana Ayer: On page 9, line 442 should read, “…objection was that since Mr. Leath was 14
<br />not the original applicant and he is only appearing now, therefore, his application is not 15
<br />timely. If Mr. Leath is a member of Preserve Rural Orange, he wasn’t on the application…”. 16
<br /> 17
<br />Mark Micol: On page 10, line 518 should read, “…testimony or not consider her testimony, if 18
<br />we find she is not in proper standing. Is that correct?” 19
<br /> 20
<br />Dawn Brezina: On page 10, line 504 should read, “…I am changing my mind on how the 21
<br />board should address this. Perhaps we should hear…” 22
<br /> 23
<br />Sahana Ayer: Correct spelling of last name from Ayers to Ayer on all lines. 24
<br /> 25
<br />Brian Ferrell: On page 11, line 578 should read, “The objection would be the appropriate 26
<br />evidence is the report itself…” On page 14, line 719 should read, “…rather than a factual 27
<br />determination. I think ultimately…” On page 16, line 843 should read, “Again, it is important 28
<br />to clarify what is before this board tonight. From what the applicant…” On page 17, line 926 29
<br />should read, “…but I don’t know if that decision and determination…”. Line 927 should read, 30
<br />“…plan application at issue. The board will have to…” Line 929 should read, “…are they 31
<br />relevant to the determination of whether the application was approved correctly?” 32
<br /> 33
<br />Larry Wright: On page 17, line 931 should read, “…in our discussions we can discuss 34
<br />whether we feel…” 35
<br /> 36
<br />Sahana Ayer: On page 16, line 838 should read, “…the progress of construction, I don’t see 37
<br />the relevance …” 38
<br /> 39
<br />Steve Keadey: On page 17 line 886 should read, “The university would object on relevance 40
<br />grounds, and that would include an objection to the board considering any part of Exhibit Two 41
<br /> starting on page 10, for which is the page that says, “Active Construction Projects: Bingham 42
<br />Facility” and continuing.” On page 17, line 898 should read, “Page 9, is the page that says 43
<br />“Existing Photos-UNC Site Plan” and under that, “from agenda packet, page 134. The next 44
<br />page, page 10 is entitled, “Active Construction Projects: Bingham Facility.” 45
<br />46
|