Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Approved 6/13/2011 <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 3/14/11 Page 55 of 59 <br />1 <br />Article 8.2.1 <br />2. The use will maintain or <br />enhance the value of contiguous <br />property (unless the use is a <br />public necessity, in which case <br />the use need not maintain or <br />enhance the value of contiguous <br />property). <br /> <br /> To be determined by Board <br />after receiving evidence to be <br />submitted or heard at public <br />hearing. <br /> Will ___Will Not <br /> 2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br /> <br />Motion made by David Blankfard to add another condition to this permit that an updated reported from Mr. Knight is <br />added … <br /> <br />Tom Brown: We will discuss that under conditions. I don’t see a problem with that but we will need to discuss that <br />with the conditions portions because what you are looking at here, will the use maintain or enhance the value of <br />contiguous property. You are using Mr. Knight’s report as the basis but then you would, under conditions have an <br />updated report. <br /> <br />David Blankfard: I could state that as a condition of acceptance? <br /> <br />Sahana Ayer: We are not acting on it? <br /> <br />David Blankfard: It would be nice to have all the paperwork in line. <br /> <br />Larry Wright: Didn’t he say that it probably would not impact it. <br /> <br />David Blankfard: It is not because this report is based on finishes and features of the kennel. They have added <br />acoustical work to it so it would enhance his report. <br /> <br />Tom Brown: When we are in the general articles, would it be appropriate to actually mention a condition there or <br />delay that until you get to the condition on the back? <br /> <br />Sahana Ayer: If you are adding information, that should go to the back but if you are thinking of making a decision <br />now or deferring your decision, you have to make your decision on what was presented. You can add a condition <br />later that could reference the acoustical experts. That is okay but as far as the value of the property; you have to <br />base your decision on what was presented. <br /> <br />Tom Brown: We will or will not, based on here today, put a condition on the back that would require an updated <br />report but that would not have an impact on that particular article. Based on the testimony on what we have heard <br />here you have to make a call. <br /> <br />Motion made by David Blankfard proposed that for Article 8.2.1 (2) that based on the report by Mr. Knight dated <br />September 3, 2010 that gives the general materials and configuration of the kennel, that it will maintain or enhance <br />the value of contagious properties. Seconded Larry Wright. <br />Vote: Unanimous