Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Approved 3/14/2011 <br /> <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 11/8/2010 Page 22 of 43 <br />1 <br />ARTICLE 8.2.1 & 8.2.2 - APPLICATION COMPONENTS 2 <br />(“Will” indicates compliance; “Will Not” indicates non -compliance) 3 <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />FINDINGS <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Staff <br />Recommending <br />Findings: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />EVIDENCE SUBMITTED <br />TO SUPPORT FINDINGS <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Board of Adjustment <br />Findings: <br />Ordinance Requirements <br /> <br /> <br />In accordance with Article 8.2.1 and <br />8.2.2 of the Zoning Ordinance, the <br />Board of Adjustment shall also <br />consider the following general <br />conditions before the application for a <br />Special Use can be approved: <br /> <br /> <br />Article 8.2.1 & 8.2.2 <br />1. The use will maintain or promote <br />the public health, safety and <br />general welfare, if located where <br />proposed and developed and <br />operated according to the plan as <br />submitted. <br /> <br /> To be determined by Board after <br />receiving evidence to be <br />submitted or heard at public <br />hearing. <br /> Will ___Will Not <br /> 5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />Thomas Brown: On page 119, we have the general standards and these are the standards where we must include <br />factual basis for the motion. There are three portions. <br /> <br />MOTION made by Mark Micol to find in favor of the applicant in that the use will maintain or promote the public health, <br />safety and welfare if located where proposed and developed and operated according to the plan as submitted based <br />on testimony of local resident Mr. McAdoo and HYAA official Mr. Askew stating that the project as proposed would be <br />of great social value to the surrounding area and open to a broad portion of the population as well as making sports <br />more affordable for the children of Orange County . Seconded by David Blankfard. <br />VOTE: Unanimous <br /> <br /> <br />Article 8.2.1 <br />2. The use will maintain or enhance <br />the value of contiguous property <br />(unless the use is a public <br />necessity, in which case the use <br />need not maintain or enhance the <br />value of contiguous property). <br /> <br /> To be determined by Board after <br />receiving evidence to be <br />submitted or heard at public <br />hearing. <br /> Will ___Will Not <br /> 17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />MOTION made by David Blankfard to agree with the applicant that the use will maintain or enhance the value of the <br />contiguous properties based on the impact analysis by Mr. Knight with the amended report by Mr. Knight. Seconded <br />by Larry Wright. <br />VOTE: Unanimous