|
Approved 8/9/2010
<br />OC Board of Adjustment – 5/10/2010 Page 4 of 6
<br />1
<br />2
<br />3
<br />4
<br />5
<br />6
<br />7
<br />8
<br />9
<br />10
<br />11
<br />12
<br />13
<br />14
<br />15
<br />16
<br />17
<br />18
<br />19
<br />20
<br />21
<br />22
<br />23
<br />24
<br />25
<br />26
<br />27
<br />28
<br />29
<br />30
<br />31
<br />32
<br />33
<br />34
<br />35
<br />36
<br />37
<br />38
<br />39
<br />40
<br />41
<br />42
<br />43
<br />44
<br />45
<br />46
<br />47
<br />48
<br />49
<br />50
<br />51
<br />52
<br />53
<br />54
<br />55
<br />
<br />Michael Harvey: Actually Mr. Chairman, I’m going to nitpick, it should be ‘lines’ plural on 28.
<br />
<br />Jeff Schmitt: 38, 39, 40, 41, 42
<br />
<br />Tom Brown: 42, line 53 ‘we just said an individual’ strike the ‘d’ and then over at ‘400’ it should be ‘400 feet.’ not dbs.
<br />
<br />Michael Harvey: You should probably end up putting ‘dbs’ at the end ‘get down to 40 dbs’
<br />
<br />Jeff Schmitt: 43
<br />
<br />Tom Brown: 43, line 34, “if they build it in accordance with ‘your’ recommendations”
<br />
<br />Jeff Schmitt: 44, 45, 46
<br />
<br />Debra Graham: On page 45, line 38 is that ‘Use Path Standards’ Michael? What does that mean?
<br />
<br />Michael Harvey: That was a discussion between Nick and Vic over a specific… I think it was use path.
<br />
<br />Debra Graham: Ok
<br />
<br />Michael Harvey: I’ll have to clarify that with Mr. Herman. There was some discussion at this junction of the meeting about
<br />what methodology was standard that Vic utilized from a market assessment standpoint. Staff has to ask the questions.
<br />
<br />Jeff Schmitt: Page 45, line 38, highlighted.
<br />
<br />Michael Harvey: The Board can make a motion if they choose to approve these minutes stipulating that staff will correct lines
<br />38 and 40 on page 45 conferring with Mr. Knight and Mr. Herman to ensure that the proper terminology is utilized.
<br />
<br />Jeff Schmitt: Debra, if you could make that as a footnote.
<br />
<br />Debra Graham: I will.
<br />
<br />Note: After conferring with Mr. Herman and Mr. Knight, the terminology was corrected to read: Uniform Standards
<br />of Professional Appraisal Practices more commonly referred to as USPAP.
<br />
<br />Mark Micol: Line 52, question mark on the end of that sentence on page 45
<br />
<br />Jeff Schmitt: 46,
<br />
<br />Mark Micol: Same thing on line 17, I guess would be a question mark there.
<br />
<br />Jeff Schmitt: 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, line 30 at the end of the sentence
<br />‘we can get them on a’ it should be ‘linear regression’ not ‘aggression’. Then on line 31 we have ‘what do you look at?’ is in
<br />there twice. 67, line 3 at the end of the sentence, ‘you have got changes in the economy, changes in interest rates, changes
<br />in inflation,’ delete the next ‘changes’ ‘these home are not homogeneous’. 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 76, 77, 78, 79,
<br />80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92
<br />
<br />Tom Brown: 92, line 53, ‘the Board of County Commissioners, in rendering’ not ‘rending’
<br />
<br />Jeff Schmitt: 93, 94
<br />
<br />Tom Brown: Line 42 on page 94, “requiring ‘a’ minimum open space”
<br />
<br />Jeff Schmitt: 95
|