Orange County NC Website
APPROVED 5/10/2010 <br /> <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 3/8/2010 Page 69 of 86 <br />1 2 3 <br />4 <br />5 6 7 <br />8 <br />9 10 11 <br />12 <br />13 14 15 <br />16 <br />17 18 19 <br />20 <br />21 22 23 <br />24 <br />25 26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 54 <br />developments that incorporated vets and kennels so I know the science and what is expected. I can give you other counties <br />we have put them in, Chatham County, Wake County. But anyway I am very familiar with citing them. <br /> <br />Rob Maitland: You had a chance to review the application and the testimony tonight, what are your findings? <br /> <br />Travis Blake: Not speaking as an appraiser or anything, just an environmental engineer or consultant. The first thing I notice <br />is that is an intensely developed site for the small amount of land that is available. It is a commercial site but not residential <br />but it should be residential neighborhood. It would normally not be placed. The applicant is correct that kennels are normally <br />in rural areas for a very good reason. Lately I would say as far back as I can remember, eight to ten years, none of the ones <br />I have cited have been in rural areas, they are all accessible, in towns, in shopping centers and the sound acoustic engineer <br />has spoke, he is very correct, you put these things buildings up and you can’t hear them. I would point out that also when <br />you get a number of dogs barking inside these faculties, dogs for a long way, other dogs can hear them outside. They hear <br />what we don’t and then sometimes in the neighborhood if they are sensitive dogs. Also, noise is subjective may not be noisy <br />in decibels but if a neighbor is hearing it off in a distance, it is a disturbance. On the impervious, if you subtract the buffer <br />and the waste water, normally, these things are something that is this commercially intensive would be in a shopping center <br />where there is sewer available and where there is storm water available so if you take off the buffer and you take off the <br />waster water area, your impervious is approaching 50% and you’re not going to get that even in commercial development. <br />That is very intensive for the small piece of property. The other things I don’t see. There shouldn’t be much traffic but you <br />have to understand that it is not those 20 animals, it is people coming to check the facility out and everything deliveries, <br />everything that goes with that. That will change the characteristic of that road or the traffic pattern. There is a lot that goes <br />on; it is not just the people. It is all the support. He wants to build 1,800 square feet of supplies. That means there will be <br />big trucks or small trucks or whatever you can get in there delivering dog food or whatever it is. I twill change the character <br />of the neighborhood, I believe. I haven’t seen anything to address lighting. A security lighting, is there going to be a lot of <br />lighting, how well is it lit while the light is on. That is pretty important; the lighting can be as bad of a nuisance as noise. I am <br />not certain about this and I dint’ have a chance to check. There is a six foot high fence; I believe the topography on the other <br />side of that is uphill if I am not mistaken so the fence doesn’t have much of an affect. The landscaping, lady and cypress <br />which are existing there are very large but they are temporary plants and they won’t be there much longer if they are over 15 <br />or 20 years old. They are subject to attacked by a number of insects and they are very shallow rooted and they tend to blow <br />over. That is it. <br /> <br />Rob Maitland: Thank you Mr. Blake. Joan Austin. <br /> <br />Joan Austin: My name is Joan Austin. I am here actually wearing two hats, I am a property owner…. <br /> <br />Jeffrey Schmitt: Were you sworn in? <br /> <br />Joan Austin: Yes. I may be the largest property owner. I don’t have a house there but I own 14 acres right here so I got the <br />letter saying that this was happening but I have never had a conversation with Mr. Lonsway about anything. Never gotten <br />any information but I do have 14 acres right there. It is the land that many of you may know as the Pines of Carolina Girl <br />Scout Council. It is Camp Pipsisiloff which is a beautiful 14 acres which I bought 22 years ago. I am also a realtor in <br />Durham. My company is Marie Austin Reality and I have been selling real estate for 36 years and I am here for both <br />reasons, as a realtor and a property owner. <br /> <br />Rob Maitland: Joan, you contacted, as a realtor, you contacted the legal council for the North Carolina Real Estate <br />Commission and that was the email I previously submitted as Defendant’s Exhibit 5? <br /> <br />Joan Austin: Yes. I am very concerned about getting my license because it is my income and so I called the North Carolina <br />Real Estate Commission and asked them if it a material fact, do we have to discuss if we have a property for sale, it is a <br />material fact that there is a dog kennel next door. Tom Miller, y’all saw that email, it is not even a question. It absolutely is a <br />material fact and if you would look at that very first line, it is absolutely a material fact. I think that somebody read the <br />definition of material fact but basically it is something that must be disclosed. The bottom line is actually that if the <br />Southerlands had their house for sale, if they called me and said, I want you to sell my house, there is a disclosure they must <br />fill out and, do you mind if I pass this out? <br />