Browse
Search
BOA minutes 030810
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
2010
>
BOA minutes 030810
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:20:36 AM
Creation date
3/7/2018 10:56:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/8/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
BOA agenda 030810
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Agendas\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPROVED 5/10/2010 <br /> <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 3/8/2010 Page 67 of 86 <br />1 2 3 <br />4 <br />5 6 7 <br />8 <br />9 10 11 <br />12 <br />13 14 15 <br />16 <br />17 18 19 <br />20 <br />21 22 23 <br />24 <br />25 26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 54 <br /> <br />James Carter: I understand what you are saying about increasing in value, you have two houses, one near a kennel and one <br />further out, same house, was that 9% or 3%, I understand that. How could you have a control group to have a negative <br />impact? <br /> <br />Tom Tolley: I don’t believe these; I believe these numbers are meaningless. I believe that what was selected and what was <br />looked at cannot provide you any evidence of whether this has a negative, positive or no impact. Now to answer your <br />question, if I believe these numbers, I would say to the board members once again, is if your house is next to a dog kennel <br />and it is going up 3% a year, that is appreciation, your property is going up but if you found out that your brother-in-law three <br />miles down the road has the same size house you do built the same time and he is getting 9% just five miles away and he <br />doesn’t own a kennel. I think in your mind that would be a negative impact. That is my opinion as an appraiser and then <br />once again looking at how factors affect the value. I am not going to argue that any of those show depreciation so if you <br />baseline is that it has to depreciate to be negative, then I can’t say that but my baseline is that if yours is getting less <br />because once again, there are a lot of other factors that affect appreciation besides the kennel or anything else. The fact <br />that you are in Orange County or Durham or Wake County, your property value goes up more than living in Orange County. <br />The argument would be that my property values are going up because of my location because I am in Orange County but <br />they are not going up as much as your neighbor five miles down the road that doesn’t have a kennel. That is my baseline is <br />that there are going up at a lower rate than other homes or than they were before the kennel came in. I just want to clarify <br />that I believe the numbers in this report are totally meaningless. I don’t believe you can infer anything from these numbers <br />because the data where it could be collected, there was no data to collect. <br /> <br />James Carter: If you are going to have both of these factors involved, how do they correlate in property value. You <br />mentioned an Impact Analysis and Data Analysis, my question if that if you are going to have Impact Analysis and Data <br />Analysis, how does that correlate the property value? <br /> <br />Tom Tolley: I am not sure I understand what you are saying. <br /> <br />James Carter: You mentioned earlier about an Impact Analysis. <br /> <br />Tom Tolley: As opposed to an appraisal? <br /> <br />James Carter: Right. You also mentioned the fact that you couldn’t find appropriate dates… <br /> <br />Tom Tolley: I am not saying always but in a lot of cases, it is very difficult to do. It is very difficult to find data and I have <br />done this for a lot of different types of properties. I have looked at it for kennels, for adult establishments, it is very difficult to <br />find enough sales, and you’re a statistics guy, you can’t find one or two, you have to find enough data to provide a proper <br />sample in order to make a judgment and I am saying in this case, the best places to go for that data, there was not enough, <br />obviously not enough or I am sure Vic would have used it. I am saying that once you get to that point and go to where the <br />data should be to really give you an answer, if there is no data there, you don’t just hunt until you find some as opposed to an <br />appraisal where I have got to go wherever I need to find that data because I have to do an estimate of value for the bank <br />because I am trying to get the best estimate I can, that is my charge when I am doing an appraisal. Once again, this not <br />trying to find a value, this is trying to find what the impact is and you can’t just go and accept anything as a dapple. <br /> <br />Mark Micol: Would you accept Days on the Market liquidity as a data point if you have a lack of sales? <br /> <br />Tom Tolley: I think you could use Days on the Market. <br /> <br />Mark Micol: For those two kennels. <br /> <br />Tom Tolley: If you are seeing a longer Days on the Market but once again, that has to be in a vacuum because right now, in <br />general, you could be 100 miles from a kennel, your Days on the Market are high for most properties. <br /> <br />Mark Micol: For those two kennels, would you use listing established? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.