Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
APPROVED 5/10/2010 <br /> <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 3/8/2010 Page 14 of 86 <br />1 2 3 <br />4 <br />5 6 7 <br />8 <br />9 10 11 <br />12 <br />13 14 15 <br />16 <br />17 18 19 <br />20 <br />21 22 23 <br />24 <br />25 26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 54 <br />Tony Whitaker: Of course it occurred to me. <br /> <br />Rob Maitland: I just ask you that. <br /> <br />Tony Whitaker: No you didn’t. <br /> <br />Rob Maitland: I said isn’t this more of an impact on the Southerland’s property if they are going to park down here close to <br />the home. <br /> <br />Tony Whitaker: You ask me if it was an impact on the property and I don’t believe that is an impact on the property. <br /> <br />Rob Maitland: Even though that is not going to be an impact, that is where we are going to build all this landscaped area and <br />the proposed wooden fence. <br /> <br />Tony Whitaker: I believe the landscaping that both exists and the landscaping provided will work together to take away <br />whatever impact might have otherwise been caused. <br /> <br />Rob Maitland: I understand. The existing septic tank that is not being used, is that this one? <br /> <br />Tony Whitaker: That is the existing septic system where the septic lines exist, yes. <br /> <br />Rob Maitland: That is located immediately on the property lines of the Southerland’s. <br /> <br />Tony Whitaker: I am not aware that it is on the property line. <br /> <br />Rob Maitland: But it is pretty close. <br /> <br />Tony Whitaker: Yes it is pretty close. <br /> <br />Rob Maitland: But it is not being used at this time. <br /> <br />Tony Whitaker: No it is not. <br /> <br />Rob Maitland: But with this project, it will be used? <br /> <br />Tony Whitaker: Yes. <br /> <br />Rob Maitland: Why was that septic field first put in. <br /> <br />Tony Whitaker: I don’t know. I have heard a reason that was given to me but I haven’t verified it. I understand it was for the <br />possibility of putting a second residence on the property. <br /> <br />Rob Maitland: That is my understanding too but they couldn’t get a permit, for a mother in law house or something. <br /> <br />Tony Whitaker: I don’t know the zoning implications but the septic system was approved and a permit was issued for that <br />but never put in service. <br /> <br />Rob Maitland: Basically, this septic tank they put in for a mother in law house but they couldn’t build it, it is now easier for <br />them to get a permit for the dog kennel? <br /> <br />Tony Whitaker: As I described, the size of the existing septic system was used as a constraint for the design of how many <br />dog runs should be as a maximum placed in the kennel. <br /> <br />Rob Maitland: The stipulation of your application is 20 maximum dogs, right?