BOA minutes 020810 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

APPROVED 5/10/2010 OC Board of Adjustment – 2/8/2010 Page 3 of 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 Michael Harvey: Staff needs a point of clarification. You adjourned this meeting to a date and time specific, correct? You continued the case to a date and time specific. Jeffrey Schmitt: Yes. Michael Harvey: The reason I am asking is because as a result I will have to send out notices. Ladies and gentleman, if I could have your attention please. This Board of Adjustment has adjourned this particular case to a date and time certain. We are not obligated to send out reminder notices of this hearing. You will not be getting anything in the mail and we are not required to post a sign on the property indicating the date when this meeting will be reconvened. 2. CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA There were no additions to the agenda. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. January 11, 2010 Jeffrey Schmitt: Please read through to see if there are any modifications that need to be made. Tina, because of the nature and length of this meeting, would it be possible to get water and maybe fruit for the board. Michael Harvey: Mr. Chairman, I would refer to Mr. Roberts, but I am going to suggest that, as always, any corrections to the minutes be made before approving the minutes, then you begin working on the order of interpretation so that you are approving the record and the order at the same time, and then finally you will approve the minutes from the January 11, 2010 regular meeting. You have before you an order of interpretation in draft form. It is an example of the findings that ought to be made regarding the Shields’ case, based on your discussion at the January meeting. As the minutes of the Shields’ meeting includes a motion to affirm the zoning enforcement’s decision, we believe that those minutes should not be approved until this order is completed and voted on so the minutes will reflect the issuance of the final order. The order has to become part of the record. David Blankfard: On page 48, line 1, “you had a turn of phrase for it, and you said it was made”. Thomas Brown: On page 12, line 29, should read, “But the advertisement for someone to come and play with us,” Page 16, line 10 should read, “Do the six teams in your league…” Page 24, line 28 should read “If it was built”. Page 25, line 41 should read, “The principal is...” Page 28, line 26 should read, “don’t you feel like being privy…” Page 30, line 52 should read, “You never intended…” Page 52, line 4, “No evidence has been presented and I have not seen it.” Page 53; line 6 “Thomas Brown moved that for the appeal number A-7-09, the decision of the zoning officer…” 5. A-7-09 – APPEAL OF A DECISION MADE BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBMITTED BY MS. SARA SHIELDS. The Board of Adjustment shall review and certify the record concerning the denial of an APPEAL application, submitted by Ms. Sara Shields, relating to the Zoning Officer’s decision to allow the development and use of outdoor sports field lights to illuminate the playing area of the athletic field by the Lattisville Grove Missionary Baptist Church. The purpose of this item is to allow for the Board members to certify the record concerning the disposition of this case. The PUBLIC HEARING on this item was closed on January 11, 2010 and no additional public comment on the proposal shall be heard. Jeffrey Schmitt: I would like to move to the document Michael has in front of you, “Order of Interpretation”.