Browse
Search
BOA minutes 111113
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
2013
>
BOA minutes 111113
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:17:01 AM
Creation date
3/7/2018 10:44:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/11/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
BOA agenda 111113
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Agendas\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 4/22/2014 <br /> <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 11/11/2013 Page 56 of 123 <br /> 1 <br />Ordinance <br />Requirements <br />PLANNING <br />STAFF <br />RECOMMENDED <br />FINDINGS <br />EVIDENCE SUBMITTED <br />TO SUPPORT <br />FINDINGS <br />BOA <br /> FINDINGS <br />Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c) <br /> <br />The location and character <br />of the use, if developed <br />according to the plan <br />submitted, will be in <br />harmony with the area in <br />which it is to be located and <br />the use is in compliance <br />with the plan for the <br />physical development of <br />the County as embodied in <br />these regulations or in the <br />Comprehensive Plan, or <br />portion thereof, adopted by <br />the Board of County <br />Commissioners. <br /> x Is __ Is Not Staff will remind the Board <br />there is the following <br />information available, as <br />submitted by the <br />applicant, related to <br />addressing this <br />requirement: <br />• The application <br />package and project <br />narrative contained <br />within Attachment 2 <br />of the abstract. <br />• Attachment 2 of the <br />abstract contains an <br />impact analysis, <br />completed by Scott <br />Dorset, indicating the <br />project will not impact <br />the value of adjacent <br />property. <br />• The submitted site <br />plan denoting the <br />projects compliance <br />with the UDO. <br /> x Is __ Is Not <br /> 2 <br /> 3 <br /> 4 <br />MOTION made by Karen Barrows to find in favor of Section 5.3.2(A)(2)(c) that the use will maintain the character 5 <br />of the use and will be in harmony with the area. Seconded by Jeff Schmitt. 6 <br />VOTE: Unanimous 7 8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.