|
Approved 4/22/2014
<br />
<br />OC Board of Adjustment – 11/11/2013 Page 2 of 123
<br />debate we…”. On page 22, line 5 should read, “Are you contending that the surveyor is incorrect in what he 1
<br />states…”. On page 23, line 35 should read, “That is the tot lot we just looked…”. On page 23, line 44 should 2
<br />read, “Geof Gledhill: It doesn’t matter. [How much acreage can be used as a field?]. The reason for that is 3
<br />clarification and that was the point of the discussion. Mr. Gledhill’s comment was basically how much acreage 4
<br />can be used as a field? On page 24, line 19 should read, “unsuitability is a point”. On page 24, line 34 should 5
<br />read, “Geof Gledhill: For one thing I can’t read it and digest it in two minutes. Second it is apparent to me that it 6
<br />is some kind of contemporaneous negotiation going on with the planning department and this developer.” On 7
<br />page 24, line 43 should read, “Larry Wright: It discusses special use permit in paragraph 3, the multi-family 8
<br />parcel will…”. On page 25, line 2 should read, “Larry Wright: Submit it into evidence and once you make your 9
<br />summary claims I would come…”. On page 28, line 11 should read, “Michael Buck: Here is the county’s estimate 10
<br />which is argumentative which we will skip…”. On page 29, line 39 should read, “David Blankfard: Can we hear 11
<br />from the county and then move the deliberations in the next session…”. On page 30, line 15 and line 16 should 12
<br />read, “meaning I will flesh out the questions so he can answer as many in a yes or no format as possible to save 13
<br />time. On page 30, line 16, begin new paragraph, “Geof Gledhill: Through the recorded SUP included those 14
<br />document incorporated to it by reference together with recorded plats memorialize this Scotswood Planned 15
<br />Development special use?”. On page 30, line 23 should read, “documents incorporated by reference?”. On page 16
<br />30, line 36 should read, “Michael Harvey: Yes sir. They do”. On page 30, line 39 should read, “Churton Grove, 17
<br />Braddock Park, the commercial area satisfies the complained about recreation…”. On page 30, line 48 should 18
<br />read, “This includes parking, property located in required setbacks…”. On page 31, line 9 should read, “Geof 19
<br />Gledhill: Have you also prepared a document that connects the various PINs that you show…”. On page 31, line 20
<br />24 should read, These names become synonymous depending on which plat you are looking at.”. On page 31, 21
<br />line 27 should read, “Phase IV is referred to on Plat book 103, phage 63 and 64.” On page 31, line 32 should 22
<br />read, “specifically in an open grass play area according to the plat that is on plat book 103…” On page 31, line 23
<br />35 should read, “We have 2.381 acres per the approved plat and on the next page we have the Phase II…” On 24
<br />page 31, line 38 should read, “includes dedication of open space around…” On page 31, line 50 should read, 25
<br />“The document has been entered into record, Attachment I.” On page 32, line 1 should read, “The required ratios 26
<br />denoting how much recreational area is required is listed on the approved site plan and I am referencing the 27
<br />condition of the approved plat.” On page 32, line 21 should read, “Geof Gledhill: With all due respect, Mr. Buck 28
<br />is cross examining. Begin a new paragraph, “Geof Gledhill: When Scotswood was…” On page 32, line 23 29
<br />should read, “were County Zoning regulations and subdivision regulations contained in the zoning...”. On page 30
<br />32, line 28 should read, “Geof Gledhill: Are those documents in the record?”. Page 32, line 32 should read “Geof 31
<br />Gledhill: Explain the reason for the “1981” draft ordinance…”. On page 32, line 37 should read, “the ordinance 32
<br />that existed on the day this project was approved in the public record or in our files.”. Page 32, line 39 should 33
<br />read, “ordinance and compared it to a copy of the ordinance that was in force and effect the day…”. Page 32, 34
<br />line 42 should read, “We included both the draft and actual zoning ordinance in the record…”, On page 33, line 8 35
<br />should read, “speaks extensively about Section IV-B-7-b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations…”. Line 36
<br />13 should read, “Geof Gledhill: Prior to the adoption of Section IV-B-7-b of the County’s subdivision regulations”. 37
<br /> Line 19 should read, “in Section 6.12.2.6 of the Zoning Ordinance requiring a specific recreational space ration of 38
<br />.019.” Line 20 and 21 should read, “The process to determine required recreation was to take the gross size of a 39
<br />project and multiply it by the ratio that would give you the acreage required.” Line 34 should read, “approved 40
<br />were not detailed and not as specific as the IV-B-7-b and essentially the recreation…”. Line 39 and 40 should 41
<br />read, “Geof Gledhill: Condition 27 of the special use permit relating to the recreation is couched in what terms.”. 42
<br />On page 34, line 8 should read, “Michael Harvey: The current subdivision regulation, Section IV-B-7-b…”. Line 43
<br />20 should read, “6.12.2.6 of the zoning ordinance…” Line 28 should read, “Geof Gledhill: August 4, 1986, is your 44
<br />testimony as to when the recreation components were fleshed out in the adoption of Section IV-B-7-b in the 45
<br />subdivision regulations”. Line 41 should read, “Geof Gledhill: The recreation component IV-B-77b was being 46
<br />discussed while Scotswood was going…”. On page 35, line 1 and 2 should read, “Geof Gledhill: In my argument 47
<br />I will quibble with the planning director’s use of the term exempt. Another term is legally correct and yes that is 48
|