Browse
Search
BOA minutes 111113
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
2013
>
BOA minutes 111113
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:17:01 AM
Creation date
3/7/2018 10:44:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/11/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
BOA agenda 111113
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Agendas\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 4/22/2014 <br /> <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 11/11/2013 Page 16 of 123 <br /> 1 <br />David Rooks: Mr. Buck, if I may, just to keep things moving, what is your objection to C-1-B? 2 <br /> 3 <br />Michael Buck: That the last paragraph on the first page, the open space passive area is consistent with 4 <br />requirements of Condition 27. I stipulate that the plats say what they say what … 5 <br /> 6 <br />David Rooks: Mr. Buck, you disagree with the conclusion stated, is that correct? 7 <br /> 8 <br />Michael Buck: I don’t object to anything else. 9 <br /> 10 <br />David Rooks: That is not an objection that is an argument, so you will have your time to make the argument that 11 <br />that is incorrect. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Michael Buck: Okay. 14 <br /> 15 <br />David Rooks: And your objection to C-1-A? 16 <br /> 17 <br />Michael Buck: Same thing, note two. 18 <br /> 19 <br />David Rooks: I think it is the same response. That is an argument you are privileged to make. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Larry Wright: Do you have any more evidence or testimony? 22 <br /> 23 <br />Geof Gledhill: Are these admitted into evidence? All these exhibits? 24 <br /> 25 <br />Larry Wright: Yes. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Geof Gledhill: That’s all the evidence we have. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Larry Wright: You have no further testimony? 30 <br /> 31 <br />David Rooks: Mr. Chairman, typically in an adversary proceeding, the party with the burden of persuasion gets to 32 <br />argue last and I believe you are at the point of argument. If that is the case, Mr. Buck would get the last 33 <br />argument and it would be up to the county to make any argument it chooses to make at this point and then Mr. 34 <br />Buck has the last word. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Geof Gledhill: Before I begin, I am passing out the document which is Geof Gledhill piecing together plats that 37 <br />are in evidence. It is very hard to see what this project looks like from looking at these incredibly complex plats. I 38 <br />have tried to compile enough of these plats so that this recreation area stands out in its totality. This is not 39 <br />evidence but part of my argument. This is the original. I have cut and pasted the original plat pieces so you can 40 <br />capture this project. 41 <br /> 42 <br />David Rooks: Were your cows neglected while you were in the process of doing this? 43 <br /> 44 <br />Geof Gledhill: My cows are being neglected as we speak. I have shown, on these maps, the different phases, 45 <br />parts of this project that are in the maps that have been admitted into evidence. Let me begin by saying that Mr. 46 <br />Buck’s appeal alleges the failure of Scotswood, now Churton Grove, Braddock Park and whatever the 47 <br />commercial development portion of this is called, particular recreation requirements of subdivision regulations. 48
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.