BOA minutes 111113 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 4/22/2014 OC Board of Adjustment – 11/11/2013 Page 13 of 123 use is approved most notably those establishing the requirements through the provision of recreational amenities 1 are detailed within Article 6 of the Zoning Ordinance. This should be Attachment H not Attachment I. 2 3 Geof Gledhill: With that correction, we offer this document into evidence. The next document is what was 4 referred to by Mr. Harvey when he testified is County Handout 2 which will we now call C-1-B and that is the 5 document that now the reorganization with relocation of the streets and also the amenities including foot bridges 6 and other bridges. Essentially this is also a document that Mr. Harvey testified to and we offer C-1-B into 7 evidence. It is labeled as Attachment 5 County Handout is now called C-1-B. The next document is C-1-C. It is 8 sheet 9 of the Special Use Permit which Mr. Buck testified concerning but was not in Attachment C. It was 9 overlooked when we put Attachment C together. It is the phasing plan for this project. We want to correct that 10 oversight and put into evidence Exhibit C-1-C. Last, we will call this one C-1-D. It is another color map with a 11 legend on the left. As to that I will ask Mr. Harvey, this is new evidence, I am going to ask Mr. Harvey to explain 12 what this document shows and testify concerning what it is. 13 14 Michael Harvey: Handout C-1-D is a supplemental map denoting trail locations. Mr. Buck has indicated that we 15 provided you a map with your September meeting and one of the trails was improperly noted and one trail was 16 missing. We have corrected those errors after conducting a GPS survey of the trails throughout Churton Grove. 17 The green line denotes project boundary, the black lines obviously denote trails. We have identified the two 18 pedestrian bridges; specifically the corner of the project over the flood plain, Nancy Hill Creek and the pedestrian 19 bridge incorporated Churton Grove Boulevard. Also reminding you as we did last month, there is a pedestrian 20 trail under the bridge connecting trails throughout the area. There are approximately three miles of trails 21 throughout the project. The trails are approximately five feet in width meaning there is 1.8 acres of trails 22 qualifying as active recreation per Condition 27 of the project. We had not previously calculated trail area. We 23 will also stipulate that this does not include sidewalks. Sidewalks are a separate condition in the SUP. 24 25 Geof Gledhill: We offer into evidence C-1-D. 26 27 Larry Wright: Any objection to this? Mr. Buck. 28 29 Michael Buck: I have no objection to C-1-D but I would offer at least one correction, there is another path 30 between Foreman Street and Dunn Place that is not reflected in here. 31 32 Michael Harvey: I understand. Mr. Chair, all I will offer is that it didn’t appear open when we were doing our 33 survey so we didn’t capture it. It doesn’t change the fact that there is approximately three miles of trail, 1.8 acres 34 of active recreation encompassing the trail. 35 36 Michael Buck: I don’t object to the map, I don’t object to the distance, I do object to the second to the last 37 paragraph in yellow that qualifies the acreage as being active recreation. That is an interpretation that I disagree 38 with so I will object to…. 39 40 Larry Wright: We are on C-1-D? 41 42 Michael Buck: Yes. 43 44 Larry Wright: The last paragraph that begins “staff had not previously calculated…”? 45 46 Michael Buck: I object to that characterization. 47 48