Approved 4/22/2014
<br />
<br />OC Board of Adjustment – 11/11/2013 Page 1 of 123
<br />MINUTES 1
<br />BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 2
<br />NOVEMBER 11, 2013 3
<br />REGULAR MEETING 4
<br /> 5
<br />MEMBERS PRESENT: Larry Wright, Full Member (Chair) 6
<br /> David Blankfard, Full Member (Vice Chair) 7
<br /> Karen Barrows, Full Member 8
<br /> Mark Micol, Alternate Member 9
<br /> Jeffrey Schmitt, Full Member 10
<br /> 11
<br />MEMBER ABSENT: Samantha Cabe, Alternate Member 12
<br /> 13
<br />STAFF PRESENT: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor 14
<br /> Debra Graham, Board Secretary 15
<br /> James Bryan, Staff Attorney 16
<br /> 17
<br /> OTHERS: Geoffrey Gledhill, Attorney Representing Orange County 18
<br /> David Rooks, Attorney Representing the Board of Adjustment 19
<br /> 20
<br />AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER 21
<br /> 22
<br />Larry Wright called the meeting to order at 5:00 pm. Mr. Blankfard previously read the public charge at the 23
<br />previous meeting so I don’t think that needs to be read again. 24
<br /> 25
<br />AGENDA ITEM 2: CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA 26
<br /> 27
<br />AGENDA ITEM 3: APPROVAL OF MINUTES 28
<br /> 29
<br />A. SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 30
<br /> 31
<br />Michael Harvey: On page 2, line 43 should read, “There will be further testimony from the county with respect to 32
<br />this appeal…”. On page 6, line 36 should read, “To page 56”. On page 7, line 5 should read, “Geof Gledhill: I 33
<br />get it, so now we are on a different document which is Appellant Exhibit 4 (PowerPoint presentation). On page 7, 34
<br />line 13 should read, “set of critical findings and those findings must be supported by substantial competent 35
<br />and...”. On page 9, line 8 should read, “Michael Harvey: Mr. Buck, technically, the special use permit is in 36
<br />Attachment C. You referenced the SUP in Attachment A but the approved copy is in Attachment C. Michael 37
<br />Buck: I would like to…”. On page 9, line 42 should read, “What Dr. Wright was referring to in 2007 is, I 38
<br />believe…”. On page 11, line 14 should read, “I will now move to the developers…”. On page 13, line 18 should 39
<br />read, “(Walkways and bridges are not connected, logical, convenient or safe). On page 17, line 43 should read, “I 40
<br />will do my best to offer evidence without making whatever argument is purported to…”. On page 18, line 2 should 41
<br />read, “enacted after 1986 and the two cases I would like to show are…” On page 18, line 20 and 21 should read, 42
<br />“…women involved in this correspondence (that is an expression). It is not evidence, nothing to identify it as a 43
<br />planning document…”. 44
<br /> 45
<br />Michael Harvey: On page 20, line 10 should read, “Is that in the ordinance for a special use….”. On page 21, 46
<br />line 8 should read, “Michael Buck: It is referenced on page 41 called freemaptools.com and it is a 47
<br />planimeter…”On page 21, line 48 should read, “The ordinance that applies in my opinion, and that is a point of 48
|