| Approved 4/22/2014 
<br /> 
<br />OC Board of Adjustment – 11/11/2013  Page 1 of 123 
<br />MINUTES 1 
<br />BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 2 
<br />NOVEMBER 11, 2013 3 
<br />REGULAR MEETING 4 
<br /> 5 
<br />MEMBERS PRESENT:  Larry Wright, Full Member (Chair) 6 
<br /> David Blankfard, Full Member (Vice Chair) 7 
<br /> Karen Barrows, Full Member 8 
<br /> Mark Micol, Alternate Member 9 
<br /> Jeffrey Schmitt, Full Member 10 
<br /> 11 
<br />MEMBER ABSENT: Samantha Cabe, Alternate Member 12 
<br />  13 
<br />STAFF PRESENT:   Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor 14 
<br />  Debra Graham, Board Secretary 15 
<br />  James Bryan, Staff Attorney 16 
<br /> 17 
<br /> OTHERS:  Geoffrey Gledhill, Attorney Representing Orange County 18 
<br />  David Rooks, Attorney Representing the Board of Adjustment 19 
<br /> 20 
<br />AGENDA ITEM 1:  CALL TO ORDER 21 
<br /> 22 
<br />Larry Wright called the meeting to order at 5:00 pm.  Mr. Blankfard previously read the public charge at the 23 
<br />previous meeting so I don’t think that needs to be read again. 24 
<br /> 25 
<br />AGENDA ITEM 2:  CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA 26 
<br /> 27 
<br />AGENDA ITEM 3:  APPROVAL OF MINUTES 28 
<br /> 29 
<br />A. SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 30 
<br /> 31 
<br />Michael Harvey:  On page 2, line 43 should read, “There will be further testimony from the county with respect to 32 
<br />this appeal…”.  On page 6, line 36 should read, “To page 56”.  On page 7, line 5 should read, “Geof Gledhill:  I 33 
<br />get it, so now we are on a different document which is Appellant Exhibit 4 (PowerPoint presentation).  On page 7, 34 
<br />line 13 should read, “set of critical findings and those findings must be supported by substantial competent 35 
<br />and...”.  On page 9, line 8 should read, “Michael Harvey:  Mr. Buck, technically, the special use permit is in 36 
<br />Attachment C.  You referenced the SUP in Attachment A but the approved copy is in Attachment C.  Michael 37 
<br />Buck:  I would like to…”.  On page 9, line 42 should read, “What Dr. Wright was referring to in 2007 is, I 38 
<br />believe…”.  On page 11, line 14 should read, “I will now move to the developers…”.  On page 13, line 18 should 39 
<br />read, “(Walkways and bridges are not connected, logical, convenient or safe).  On page 17, line 43 should read, “I 40 
<br />will do my best to offer evidence without making whatever argument is purported to…”.  On page 18, line 2 should 41 
<br />read, “enacted after 1986 and the two cases I would like to show are…”  On page 18, line 20 and 21 should read, 42 
<br />“…women involved in this correspondence (that is an expression).  It is not evidence, nothing to identify it as a 43 
<br />planning document…”. 44 
<br /> 45 
<br />Michael Harvey:  On page 20, line 10 should read, “Is that in the ordinance for a special use….”.  On page 21, 46 
<br />line 8 should read, “Michael Buck:  It is referenced on page 41 called freemaptools.com and it is a 47 
<br />planimeter…”On page 21, line 48 should read, “The ordinance that applies in my opinion, and that is a point of 48 |