Orange County NC Website
APPROVED 11/11/2013 <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 9/10/2013 Page 37 of 38 <br />Michael Harvey: Technically there are three. You have a foot bridge here, a small foot bridge 1 <br />here which crosses Nancy Hill Creek. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Jeff Schmitt: So the little corner that crosses the blue from a definitional perspective we are 4 <br />saying is sufficient even though the floodplain exists? 5 <br /> 6 <br />Michael Harvey: This qualifies as the foot bridge crossing as required by the SUP. This is just 7 <br />crossing a small tributary. It is a convenience. Then we have Berryman Avenue that has a 8 <br />sidewalk which we count as a required bridge and it is our stipulation that only two bridges are 9 <br />required. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Geof Gledhill: It is your testimony that there are two pedestrian bridges crossing Nancy Hill Creek 12 <br />that area connected to the pedestrian trail system? 13 <br /> 14 <br />Michael Harvey: Yes sir. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Geof Gledhill: The specific recreation requirements in the special use permit are 17 <br />recommendations? 18 <br /> 19 <br />Michael Harvey: Yes. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Geof Gledhill: That is all I have. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Michael Buck: About the bridges, it sounded like you were saying there were three bridges and I 24 <br />wanted to flesh that out, were you trying to make a definitional distinction? 25 <br /> 26 <br />Michael Harvey: My only distinction is there are only two bridges in my mind that satisfy the 27 <br />requirements of the SUP. There was a third bridge, that foot bridge crossing a tributary and does 28 <br />not cross Nancy Hill Creek. There is a small foot bridge here. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Michael Buck: You are counting the Berryman Bridge as one, the tributary as two and the small 31 <br />foot bridge as three. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Michael Harvey: I am not counting the foot bridge at all. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Michael Buck: You were going to show me the section of the code that allows the inclusion of 36 <br />parking and setbacks are part of the recreational area calculation. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Michael Harvey: In Section 6.12.2 of the zoning ordinance, you have definitions and methods of 39 <br />measurement related to standards for the land use intensity ratio requirements and limitations. 40 <br />Section 6.12.2.1 gets to the definition of gross land area and what that includes, of lots, of 41 <br />residential land area, residential floor area, recreation space which is Section 6.12.2.6, recreation 42 <br />space part of total and livability of open space is exterior area appropriately approved for common 43 <br />recreational use. That includes all applicable necessary infrastructure to support the use of the 44 <br />said facility for that purpose which I claim is parking or any other necessary infrastructure which 45 <br />would include required landscaping, buffering, setbacks, that make the recreation space 46 <br />conforming to the provisions of the SUP. 47 <br /> 48 <br />Michael Buck: You mentioned the testimony of Marvin Collins in a meeting in 1986 where he said 49 <br />Scotswood would not be included in the new subdivision regulations. Did the BOCC choose to 50 <br />include that exclusion in the code. 51