BOA minutes 091013 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

APPROVED 11/11/2013 OC Board of Adjustment – 9/10/2013 Page 33 of 38 1 Geof Gledhill: Let me rephrase that to make it clear. The 1981 draft ordinance contains the 2 same recreation requirements as the 2008 ordinance except for amendments that were made 3 and were noted on in the 2008 document? 4 5 Michael Harvey: Yes sir. 6 7 Geof Gledhill: When the board is looking at the 1981 Draft Ordinance, was Mr. Buck’s appeal 8 speaks extensively about Section IV.B.7.b of the Orange County Subdivision Regulations, was 9 that first adopted by Orange County on August 4, 1986? 10 11 Michael Harvey: Yes sir. Minutes from of those meetings are contained in Attachment F. 12 13 Geof Gledhill: Prior to the adoption of Section IV.B.7.b of the County’s subdivision regulations on 14 August 4, 1986, what were the recreation requirements and essentially when this projects was 15 reviewed and approved by the Board of County Commissioners on May 20, 1986, what were the 16 recreation requirements and refer to the ordinances you have. 17 18 Michael Harvey: Recreational requirements for all planned developments were defined in detail 19 in Section 6.12.2.6 of the Zoning Ordinance requiring a specific recreational space ratio of .019. 20 The process to determine required recreation was to take the gross size of a project and multiply 21 it by the ratio and that would give you the acreage required. In conducting my research it was 22 determined at the at time when they were reviewing the project in 1985 and 1986 that 15 total 23 acres of recreation would be required and then there was an additional breakdown of active and 24 passive recreation that there would be 7 acres minimum required for active. The approve site 25 plan contained in Attachment C provides a breakdown of the required ratios enforced at the time 26 this project was reviewed and approved and provides documentation denoting how compliance 27 would be achieved. 28 29 Geof Gledhill: Were the requirements met in the recorded plats for this project? 30 31 Michael Harvey: Yes. 32 33 Geof Gledhill: The recreation requirements that existed when this special use permit was 34 approved were not detailed and not as specific as the IV.B.7.b and essentially the recreation 35 requirements that Mr. Buck has been talking about, isn’t’ that correct? 36 37 Michael Harvey: That is correct. 38 39 Geof Gledhill: Condition 27 of the special use permit relating to recreation is couched in what 40 terms……. 41 42 Michael Harvey: Recommendation for the provision of rec amenities are as follows; there is a 43 breakdown in the list of the minimum required recreation that would be desirable or necessary 44 including tennis courts, swimming pool, the appropriate parking, top lot, open grassy field. 45 Condition 27 provides a list of the necessary requirements the developer would have to utilize in 46 order to facility compliance with the SUP. 47 48 Geof Gledhill: All of that is couched in terms of recommendation? 49 50 Michael Harvey: That is correct. 51