BOA minutes 091013 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

APPROVED 11/11/2013 OC Board of Adjustment – 9/10/2013 Page 14 of 38 Karen Barrows: So it looks like very worn places that are connecting the yellow across the road 1 there. 2 3 Michael Buck: Those are dirt paths which pedestrians do use, more difficult for strollers, wheel 4 chairs and obviously the rain season, mud. 5 6 David Blankfard: Are there sidewalks in Phase IV? 7 8 Michael Buck: Yes. The special use permit, condition 10, calls for sidewalks on one side of all 9 streets in the single family portion of the development so there are sidewalks along the interior of 10 this loop, there is a sidewalk along here. If I could reserve that question to the next slide because 11 I will show how the walk pattern is affected by those sidewalks are in relation to these locations 12 where there are no asphalt paths and so the special use permit called for bridges at either end, 13 so there is the one that does exist, this is a location where there is no bridge. From the earlier 14 map, this location very close to the vehicle bridge is where a walking bridge might have been 15 located. 16 17 Geof Gledhill: I object to that characterization. 18 19 Larry Wright: Sustained. 20 21 Michael Buck: I would like to point out at location D that while there is no bridge built at this 22 location, the developers did install a sewer line across the creek so we have no bridge at another 23 location besides A but a sewer line was built across the creek. I would also like to call your 24 attention to this temporary fencing. Much of that fencing is still in the development. I have 25 another slide later that I will point out locations where that continues to exist but there are places 26 throughout the development where silt fencing exists and this was a convenient place to show 27 that to you. 28 29 Geof Gledhill: Object based on relevance. 30 31 Larry Wright: Sustained. 32 33 Michael Buck: I will make a case that there is a condition that will drive the removal of temporary 34 fencing. There are no bridges at those locations and we have already talked about the missing 35 asphalt path here and there. 36 37 Geof Gledhill: I object to both of those characterizations. 38 39 Larry Wright: On what basis? 40 41 Geof Gledhill: Again, Mr. Buck is making his argument; he is not presenting his evidence. 42 43 Larry Wright: Sustained. 44 45 Geof Gledhill: And I object to that slide showing missing bridges. That is a characterization as 46 opposed to evidence. 47 48 Larry Wright: Mr. Buck. 49 50 Michael Buck: I would submit that I could change it to no bridges exist at these locations? 51