BOA minutes 070813 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 9/10/2013 OC Board of Adjustment – 7/8/2013 Page 79 of 82 MOTION reiterated by David Blankfard to find in favor that the use will maintain or enhance the value of contiguous 1 properties based on the findings of the impact analysis prepared by David A. Smith, MAISRA, a certified appraiser. 2 3 Mark Micol amended that the use is necessary and in the public’s best interest in regards to enhanced emergency 4 communications and uninterrupted cell and/or internet service. 5 6 Samantha Cabe added that part of the basis for that finding also is that the record is void of any competent evidence 7 that rebuts Mr. Smith’s professional opinion that the value of the contiguous property will not negatively be affected. 8 VOTE: Unanimous 9 10 11 Ordinance Requirements PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDED FINDINGS EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS BOA FINDINGS Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c) The location and character of the use, if developed according to the plan submitted, will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located and the use is in compliance with the plan for the physical development of the County as embodied in these regulations or in the Comprehensive Plan, or portion thereof, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. Is __ Is Not Staff will remind the Board there is the following information available, as submitted by the applicant, related to addressing this requirement: • The application package and project narrative contained within Tab 3 of the application booklet. • Tab 39 of the application booklet contains an impact analysis, completed by David Smith, indicating the project will not impact the value of adjacent property. • Tab 6 of the application booklet contains a site plan denoting the projects compliance with the UDO. x Is __ Is Not 12 Larry Wright: We are on page 186 Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c) Do I hear a motion? 13 14 MOTION made by Samantha Cabe to find in the affirmative that the location and character of the use if developed 15 according to the plans submitted will be in harmony in the area which it is to be located and the use is in compliance 16 with the plan for the physical development of the county as embodied in these regulations or in the Comprehensive 17 Plan by the Board of the County Commissioners and the basis for such finding would be the documents contained in 18 tab 3 of the application booklet. Also, the documents behind tab 39 of the application booklet which includes the 19 Impact Analysis complete by David Smith, our certified appraiser or the certified appraiser who testified in this case 20 and the documents behind tab 6 of the application booklet which contains the site plan denoting the project’s 21 compliance with the UDO. Seconded by Mark Micol. 22 VOTE: Unanimous 23 24 25