Orange County NC Website
Approved 7/8/2013 <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 6/10/2013 Page 89 of 92 <br /> 1 <br />Greg Dixon: Most of these. Six if not all these were at the information meeting, I think. But that was 2 <br />basically showing us those maps, we have not had enough time, we had two weeks. You can look at 3 <br />the certified mail that came of the hearing. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Larry Wright: What I want to ask you is, what you would be bringing in one month from now that you 6 <br />cannot state here? 7 <br /> 8 <br />Greg Dixon: Proper representation, proper documentation, a consultation and we need to retain legal 9 <br />counsel. I have been in touch with an attorney who is out of state and he has not had enough time. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Larry Wright: We have to look at evidence; this is how we base this. We look at material evidence 12 <br />and we look at expert evidence and if you want counsel, then I can understand. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Karen Kemerait: I would object to the case being deferred. We have been discussing the case for 15 <br />approximately two hours and as I have mentioned there has been more than two months’ worth of 16 <br />notice and then the community meeting was done in addition to the ordinance requirements plus if the 17 <br />case is deferred for a month and the public hearing about what has been provided thus far is closed I 18 <br />think we would need to have an opportunity to listen to the witnesses and testimony that comes back 19 <br />at the next hearing and reopen the public hearing and give my witnesses an opportunity to respond. 20 <br />We have a room full of people who have come as well who are fully prepared to testify and we also 21 <br />have public witnesses who cared enough to come to the meeting so I think from a legal standpoint, 22 <br />closing the public hearing and just allowing additional witnesses to come from the opponents would 23 <br />not be legally sufficient and we would have to have an opportunity to respond and all our witnesses 24 <br />would have to come back again in another month as well. As I mentioned notice has been provided 25 <br />over two and half months. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Larry Wright: He says he wants to get counsel. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Karen Kemerait: I believe that over two months in which notice has been provided has been given 30 <br />ample opportunity to be prepared for the hearing. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Samantha Cabe: I have a question for each of you. At the public hearing, did you explain to the 33 <br />individual present that what you were applying to do and there was an application process and there 34 <br />would eventually be a decision made by the County? 35 <br /> 36 <br />Karen Kemerait: In the letters about the balloon test, I indicated that we had filed a Class B Permit 37 <br />application and provided the site plans, provided information about cell towers and said please call 38 <br />me or email me. I provided my direct telephone number at work and my email address and received 39 <br />the one telephone call I mentioned. During the community meeting, I talked about the hearing, it 40 <br />would be occurring tonight. I tried to provide much of the information that I provided tonight about the 41 <br />specifics, I brought the maps, the site plans and I answered the questions so it was an opportunity to 42 <br />provide as much information about our application as I could and also to respond and answer 43 <br />questions. 44 <br /> 45 <br />Samantha Cabe: Mr. Dixon, when did you contact the attorney out of state? 46 <br /> 47 <br />Greg Dixon: As soon as I got the letter about the hearing. 48 <br /> 49 <br />Samantha Cabe: So you did not contact an attorney when you found out they were going to be 50 <br />making application and asking the county? 51 <br /> 52 <br />Greg Dixon: Yes, I did contact attorneys and realtors but I could not decide…. 53