Browse
Search
BOA minutes 061013
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
2013
>
BOA minutes 061013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2018 9:17:58 AM
Creation date
3/7/2018 10:37:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/10/2013
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
BOA agenda 061013
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Board of Adjustment\Agendas\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 7/8/2013 <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 6/10/2013 Page 76 of 92 <br /> 1 <br />AGENDA ITEM 8: CASE A-2-13: Class B Special Use Permit Proposing Development of 2 <br />Telecommunication Facilities at 1426 Old Greensboro Road (PIN 9768-22-3 <br />3878) 4 <br />In accordance with Section(s) 2.7 Special Uses, 5.2.2 Table of Permitted Uses, 5.3.2 5 <br />Application of Use Standards – Special Uses, and 5.10 Standards for 6 <br />Telecommunication Facilities of the UDO American Tower and AT and T Mobility have 7 <br />submitted a Class B Special Use Permit application seeking a permit to erect a 199 8 <br />foot telecommunication tower on a 28 acre parcel of property at 1426 Old Greensboro 9 <br />Road further identified utilizing Orange County Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 10 <br />9768-22-3878. 11 <br />As detailed within the application, the applicant wishes to erect a telecommunication 12 <br />tower within a 100 foot by 100 foot leased area on the south-west portion of the 13 <br />aforementioned parcel. There will be an equipment cabinet at the base of the tower to 14 <br />house equipment for the various communication providers utilizing the tower within a 15 <br />60 foot by 60 foot fenced compound. 16 <br />Access to the proposed facility is proposed to be through a proposed drive off of 17 <br />Sesame Road. 18 <br /> 19 <br />The following persons were sworn in: 20 <br /> 21 <br />Rusty Monroe <br />Jeremy Browner <br />David A. Smith <br />Karen Kemerait <br />Dakota Johnson <br />Jill House <br />Michael Harvey <br />Kristen C. Smith <br />Desiree Goldman <br />Aaron Nelson <br />David Lacava <br />Stephen M. Howard <br />Gary Dixon <br /> 22 <br />Larry Wright. I would like to state that this is a separate case from the one before even though the 23 <br />attorney and the applicant will have the same case of characters. This will be on 1426 Old 24 <br />Greensboro Road property. Does anyone have any comments? 25 <br /> 26 <br />James Bryan: This board did hear partial testimony about this in the previous case. That expatriate 27 <br />communication just for information in case anyone came in late. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Michael Harvey: On page 97, we have another Special Use Permit by American Tower and AT&T 30 <br />Mobility proposing to erect a telecommunication facility on a parcel of property located on 1426 Old 31 <br />Greensboro Road, PIN 9768-22-3878. There is a property map in Attachment 1 providing an aerial 32 <br />photo of the property. Attachment 2 is staff comments relating to this application. We would also like 33 <br />to point out that I have a revised, what I am calling Applicant Exhibit 1, a revised letter for the Center 34 <br />of Municipal Solutions approving the project or recommending approval of the project. Attachment 3 35 <br />is a Notification of Materials for certification for the mailing and the sign posting and the special use 36 <br />permit Findings of Fact. We are looking at another 199 foot telecommunication tower and a 100 by 37 <br />100 foot leased area of the subject parcel. There will be a 60 by 60 foot fenced compound supporting 38 <br />the telecommunication tower. As we stipulated during the last application on page 99, there are no 39 <br />preselected sites or County owned/leased sites or commercial property in this general area where a 40 <br />telecommunication tower should be located and as such, this is the last tier out of the residential 41 <br />zoned property where telecommunications tower could be located and it required by 5.10.8 of the 42 <br />UDO. As I have indicated, Attachment 2 contains various comments from county departments on this 43 <br />project. We will stipulate that the applicant met their burden with respect to submission of this 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.