Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Approved 7/8/2013 <br />OC Board of Adjustment – 6/10/2013 Page 73 of 92 <br /> 1 <br />Ordinance <br />Requirements <br />PLANNING <br />STAFF <br />RECOMMENDED <br />FINDINGS <br />EVIDENCE SUBMITTED <br />TO SUPPORT <br />FINDINGS <br />BOA <br /> FINDINGS <br />Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c) <br /> <br />The location and <br />character of the use, if <br />developed according to <br />the plan submitted, will be <br />in harmony with the area <br />in which it is to be located <br />and the use is in <br />compliance with the plan <br />for the physical <br />development of the <br />County as embodied in <br />these regulations or in the <br />Comprehensive Plan, or <br />portion thereof, adopted <br />by the Board of County <br />Commissioners. <br /> Is __ Is <br />Not <br /> Staff will remind the <br />Board there is the <br />following information <br />available, as submitted <br />by the applicant, related <br />to addressing this <br />requirement: <br />• The application <br />package and project <br />narrative contained <br />within Tab 3 of the <br />application booklet. <br />• Tab 39 of the <br />application booklet <br />contains an impact <br />analysis, completed <br />by David Smith, <br />indicating the project <br />will not impact the <br />value of adjacent <br />property. <br />• Tab 6 of the <br />application booklet <br />contains a site plan <br />denoting the projects <br />compliance with the <br />UDO. <br /> x Is __ Is <br />Not <br /> 2 <br />Larry Wright: On page 94, Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c). 3 <br /> 4 <br />MOTION made by David Blankfard to find in favor that the location and character of use if developed 5 <br />according to the plan submitted will be in harmony with the area which is to be located and the use is 6 <br />in compliance with the plan for the physical development of the county as embodied in these 7 <br />regulations or in the Comprehensive Plan or a portion thereof adopted by the Board of County 8 <br />Commissioners based on the fact that it will not be an environmental impact or additional traffic, no 9 <br />lights on the structure, no noise and limited visibility. Mark Micol seconded. 10 <br />VOTE: Unanimous 11 <br /> 12 <br /> 13 <br />14